Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional CorporationShare Holder

Atty. Richard K. Hunsaker

About Atty. Richard K. Hunsaker

Atty. Richard K. Hunsaker is a lawyer practicing qui tam (whistleblower), professional liability, medical malpractice defense and 5 other areas of law. Richard received a degree from University of Illinois in 1982, and has been licensed for 40 years. Richard practices at Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional Corporation in Edwardsville, IL.

Awards

Reviews for Richard

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Professional Liability
  • Personal Injury
  • Litigation
  • Other 5
    • Qui Tam (Whistleblower)
    • Medical Malpractice Defense
    • Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices
    • Long Term Care/Nursing Homes
    • Mediation Services/Alternative Dispute Resolution

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional Corporation
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Cases: Bowman v. Ottney 2015 IL 119000 Illinois Supreme Court pronouncement that voluntarily dismissed actions which are re-filed do not afford an absolute right to a change of judge where the judge made substantive rulings in the originally filed action. The Supreme Court affirmed the trial judge's decision to deny a Motion for Change of Judge in an action which had been voluntarily dismissed
    re-filed.
    Avichail v. Jones 686 F.3d 548 (8th Cir. 2012), Not guilty verdict for a pediatric nurse in a case of a claimed brain injury following a period of depressed oxygen saturation levels. It was contended that the nurse failed to continuously monitor oxygen saturation values as ordered by the attending surgeon
    that as a result, plaintiff sustained a brain injury affecting cognition
    behavior. Verdict affirmed on appeal by Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
    Greenlee v. First National Bank in DeKalb 175 Ill. App. 3d 236 (2d Dist. 1988) Second District Appellate Court holding that national building code provisions (BOCA) adopted by DeKalb County do not apply to a 100 year old farm house.
    Kennedy v. Crusader Clinic (Jury trial, 2000, Winnebago County) Trial of what was one of the first false positive HIV tests reported in Illinois. Plaintiff sought emotional damages for three years where he believed he was HIV positive, contending that the st
    ard of care required a confirmatory retest. One of the principle defenses was the testimony of a former employee of the C.D.C. that shortly after the tests were developed, the tests were found to be very reliable, with low false positives rates. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants.
    Lower v. Rucker 217 Ill. App. 3d 1 (2d Dist. 1991) Reversal of trial court's order to produce statement of witness/passenger, who was also an insured under the same policy as the driver. The case, which involved a car/pedestrian collision at high speeds, was later tried before a jury
    resulted in a defense verdict. (Jury Trial, 1994, Ogle County)
    Paszkiewicz v. Microsurgery
    Brain Research Institute (U.S. District Court, Eastern Division of Missouri, Jury Trial 2004) Claimed spinal cord injury during back surgery alleged to have resulted from improper use of a surgical support frame
    associated medical devices. Jury verdict in favor of the defendants following a two week trial.
    People v. Fiorini 143 Ill. 2d 318 (1991) Right of contribution in Environmental Protection Act cost recovery cases recognized by Illinois Supreme Court.
    Pettie v. Williams Brothers Construction, Inc. Refusal to enforce language in an indemnification agreement between a general contractor
    the plaintiff's employer. The court's holding
    analysis was later overturned by the Illinois Supreme Court in unrelated litigation.
    Ratermann v. Tri-County Elec. Co-op., Inc. 229 Ill. 2d 658, 897 N.E.2d 263, 325 Ill. Dec. 15 (Jury Trial, Marion County, 2009) Not guilty verdict for electric utility where plaintiffs claimed a power surge resulted in a home fire. Plaintiffs relied upon res ipsa loquitor
    plaintiffs' cause
    origin expert maintained there was physical evidence of a massive high voltage surge of electricity causing simultaneous fires in two breaker panels.
    Rix v. Heartl
    Regional Medical Center No. 5-07-0006 (5th Dist. 2008) Affirmation of dismissal of class action claim brought pursuant to the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act regarding hospital pricing of services provided to uninsured patients.
    Schur v. Troy FHC (Jury Trial, 2006, Madison County, Verdict affirmed by 5th District Court of Appeals, 2008). Claim that a family practitioner failed to treat unstable angina in a patient complaining of chest pain. The patient had a normal EKG, along with a host of other non-cardiac symptoms but suffered a fatal coronary event the day following his visit with the defendant doctor. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the physician.
    USA v. Shanrie v. Henderson Associates Architects Inc. 610 F. Supp. 2d 958 (S.D. Ill. 2009) Dismissal of contribution claim brought by developers
    builder against architectural firm for alleged failure to ensure compliance with the Fair Housing Act. The Southern District of Illinois, in granting the Motion to Dismiss, concluded that the Fair Housing Act does not allow for third-party contribution or indemnity claims.
    Veltman v. Employers Mutual Casualty (Jury trial, Will County, 1996) In what is believed to be the first spoliation case tried after the Illinois Supreme Court's opinion of Boyd v. Travelers Insurance, a directed verdict was obtained for Employer's Mutual Casualty in connection with the loss of the quick coupler valve which was allegedly defective, causing an 18 years old employee to be blinded after exposure to anhydrous ammonia. The case was tried in two phases. The first phase focused on the product liability allegations against the maker of the quick coupler valve while the second phase revolved around the loss of the evidence
    whether that loss impaired the ability of the parties to adequately present their cases.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1986, Illinois
    1992, Wisconsin
    2006, Missouri
    United States District Court, Southern, Central and Northern Districts of Illinois
    United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
    United States Court of Appeals, Seventh and Eighth Circuits
    United States Supreme Court
    Memberships

    Professional Associations

    •Winnebago County Bar Association
    •Madison County Bar Association
    •St. Clair County Bar
    •Illinois State Bar Association
    •Defense Research Institute
    •Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel
    •The Missouri Bar
    •State Bar of Wisconsin

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Washington University School of Law
    Class of 1986
    JD - Juris Doctor
    Other Education
    University of Illinois
    Class of 1982
    with high distinction

    University of Illinois
    Class of 1982
    Bachelor of Arts

    University of Illinois
    Class of 1982
    Communications

    University of Illinois
    Class of 1983
    Master of Arts

    University of Illinois
    Class of 1983
    Communications
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1960
    June 2, 1960

Atty. Richard K. Hunsaker

Share Holder at Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional Corporation
Not yet reviewed

Suite 100, Mark Twain Plaza III105 West Vandalia StreetP.O. Box 467Edwardsville, IL 62025U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Michael J. Nester
Pro
Michael J. Nester
4.9
General Practice lawyer
Sean K. Cronin
Pro
Sean K. Cronin
4.2
General Practice lawyer
Brendan M. Nester
Pro
Brendan M. Nester
3.8
General Practice lawyer
Kelly Garrett-Hicks, JD
Pro
Kelly Garrett-Hicks, JD
4.5
General Practice lawyer
no photo
Pro
William A. Brasher
5.0
General Practice lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: