×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

McAlister, McAlister, Baker & Nicklas PLLCPartner
Cara Sue Nicklas
Pro

Cara Sue Nicklas

3.8
1 review

15 East 15th Street, Suite 200, P.O. Box 1569, Edmond, OK 73083

Labor and Employment, Civil Practice, Business Litigation and 12 more

About Cara Sue Nicklas

Research Editor, Oklahoma City University Law Review, 1988-1990.

Cara Sue Nicklas (Edmond, Oklahoma) View website

Awards

Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Cara Sue

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
3.8
See All Reviews
1
Lawyers.com
Not yet reviewed
3.8
Martindale
1
Avvo
Not yet reviewed

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labor and Employment
  • Civil Practice
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Administrative Law
  • Civil Rights
  • Contracts
  • General Practice
  • Other 7
    • Business & Corporate
    • Employment
    • Estate Planning and Probate
    • Guardianship
    • Probate
    • Trial Practice
    • Wills & Trusts

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    McAlister, McAlister, Baker & Nicklas PLLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Hill v. Kemp, 234 F.2d 333 (10th Cir. 2007)
    Taylor v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Sec. Com'n, 1993 OK CIV APP 195, 867 P.2d 490
    Williams v. Oklahoma Employment Sec. Com'n, 1995 OK CIV APP 66, 898 P.2d 1320
    Oklahoma Employment Sec. Com'n v. Carter, 1995 OK 74, 903 P.2d 868
    Pruitt v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Sec. Com'n, Bd. or Review, 1996 OK CIV APP 33, 918 P.2d 80
    Nordam v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Sec. Com'n, 1996 OK 110, 925 P.2d 556
    Wright v. Edwards v. Oklahoma Employment Sec. Com'n, 1997 OK 163, 934 P.2d 1088
    Ehlinger v. City of Bixby, 1997 OK CIV APP 20, 939, P.2d 34
    Gabbert v. Board of Review for Oklahoma Employment Sec. Com'n, 1997 OK CIV APP 44, 943 P.2d 158
    Fent v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Com'n, 2004 OK 59, 99 P.3d 241
    In re Gross Production
    Petroleum Excise Tax Protest of Bruner, 2006 OK CIV APP 21, 130 P.3d 767.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1990, Oklahoma
    1990, U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
    1994, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
    1996, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
    1998, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Memberships
    American Bar Association.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Oklahoma City University School of Law
    Class of 1990
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Oklahoma
    Class of 1986
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1965
    Ft. Eustis, Virginia, July 7, 1965

Contact Cara Sue Nicklas

Partner at McAlister, McAlister, Baker & Nicklas PLLC
3.8
1 review

Kirkpatrick Bank Building15 East 15th Street, Suite 200P.O. Box 1569Edmond, OK 73083U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: (405) 359-0806
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM

Email Cara Sue Nicklas

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Cara Sue Nicklas was admitted in 1990 to the State of Oklahoma.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Cara Sue Nicklas is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma and United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.
  • Does this attorney offer any legal services for a flat fee?
    Yes, Cara Sue Nicklas offers fixed fees for certain legal services.
  • Does this attorney accept major credit cards?
    Yes, Cara Sue Nicklas will accept MasterCard and Visa.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Cara Sue Nicklas attended Oklahoma City University School of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions