Cases
Experience: Representative Matters: Certain Filament Light-Emitting Diodes
Products Containing Same (II)
Inv. No. 337-TA-1220: Lead counsel in the defense of Satco in a suit brought at the International Trade Commission by complainant, the Regents of the University of California at Santa Barbara, over four patents relating to LEDs. The trial was conducted from Aug. 30-Sept. 3, 2021. Also serving as lead counsel in parallel district court litigations on the same patents which have been stayed pending the resolution of the ITC investigation.
Satco Products, Inc. v. The Regents of the University of California: Lead counsel for petitioner Satco in four inter partes review proceedings before the PTAB against The Regents of the University of California at Santa Barbara (UCSB) relating to LEDs. Successfully invalidated all claims of two patents which had been asserted by UCSB. Currently awaiting final determinations on two additional petitions for inter partes review.
Satco Products, Inc. v. Signify North America Corporation, et al.: Lead counsel for Satco in a patent infringement action filed against Signify North America Corp.
Signify Holding B.V. in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, alleging infringement of three patents directed to light bulbs containing LED filament
Gimbal LED recessed lights. Judge Albright has granted Satco's motion to dismiss seven counterclaims filed by Signify.
Satco Products, Inc. v. Seoul: Lead counsel for petitioner Satco in inter partes review proceedings before the PTAB against Seoul Viosys Co. Ltd.
Seoul Semiconductor Co. Ltd. Successfully invalidated all challenged claims in U.S. Patent No. 9,343,631, all challenged claims in U.S. Patent No. 10,134,967,
one challenged claim in U.S. Patent No. 8,860,331.
Satco Products, Inc. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., et al.: Lead counsel for Satco in a patent infringement action filed against Seoul Semiconductor Inc.
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Satco asserts that Seoul infringes three patents owned by Satco relating to LED technology.
Certain Robotic Vacuum Cleaning Devices And Components Thereof Such As Spare Parts. Representing iLife in ITC investigation involving iRobot patents related to robotic vacuums.
Certain Height-Adjustable Desk Platforms And Components Thereof. Represented Loctek in ITC investigation involving Varidesk patents related to adjustable desk mechanisms.
Swagway v. ITC. Representing Segway
Ninebot in appeal from ITC investigation.
Gonzalez v. Tagged & Gonzalez v. New Life Ventures. As lead counsel for Tagged
New Life Ventures, won judgment of invalidity after trial in E.D.Tex. in patent litigation relating to digital labels for websites.
EFF v. Personal Audio. As lead counsel for EFF, won judgment invalidating Personal Audio's podcasting patent after a trial before the Patent Trials
Appeal Board.
Prolifiq v. Veeva. As lead counsel, represented Prolifiq in patent
trade secret litigation related to software for managing regulated communications for pharmaceuticals
medical devices.
Wildcat IP v. Pokemon, et al. As lead counsel, represented Pokemon in patent litigation relating to electronic trading card systems.
Walker Digital v. MySpace, et al. As lead counsel, represented LinkedIn, MySpace
Tagged against patents asserted against social networks' use of friend relationships.
Teva Women's Health v. Mylan, Teva Women's Health v. Lupin,
related matters. Represented Teva at trial
in subsequent appeal regarding patents covering Seasonique, as well as in a set of five other related ANDA cases involving patents covering Seasonique, LoSeasonique
Cenestin .
Global Ground Automation v. Orissa, et. al. Represented Global Ground Automation at bench trial in E.D.Tex. involving patent relating to software for ground transportation.
Core Wireless v. LG. Representing LG in patent litigation involving technology related to st
ards for cellular telephones.
Joao Bock v. Charles Schwab, et. al. Won dismissal with prejudice of 41 of 43 claims for Charles Schwab in patent litigation involving financial services.
Fotomedia v. Tagged, et al. As lead counsel, represented Tagged in patent litigation relating to social networks' use of technology for displaying, uploading,
managing photos.
Beneficial Innovations v. Dem
Media, et al. As lead counsel, represented Dem
Media in patent litigation relating to Internet advertising.
Henry Huang v. Caltech, Applera, et. al. As trial counsel, won a complete defense judgment for Applera after a bench trial involving fraud
inventorship claims regarding foundational patents for automated DNA sequencing.
ASM v. Genus. Won summary judgment of non-infringement for Genus,
won Federal Circuit affirmance of that judgment, in patent litigation involving atomic layer deposition
chemical vapor deposition technology.
Applied Materials v. Podlesnik. Won preliminary injunction for Applied Materials in trade secret case against a senior executive who resigned to join a direct competitor.
Samsung v. Tessera. Trial counsel for Samsung at jury trial in N.D.Cal. involving patents relating to semiconductor packaging technology.
Semitool v. Applied Materials. Trial counsel for Applied Materials at jury trial D. OR. involving patents relating to advanced copper metallization in semiconductor manufacturing.
Won summary judgment of invalidity of seven of nine independent claims in one of the first decisions after KSR, representing a consumer electronics developer in patent litigation relating to audio
video media.
Invalidated all asserted claims in reexamination proceedings while representing Microsoft, Yahoo!
another consumer electronics developer in patent litigation relating to digital media.
Applera v. Roche. Represented Applera in patent
contract dispute involving foundational polymerase chain reaction (PCR) patents.
Unites States ex rel. MJ Research v. Applera. Won Ninth Circuit appeal for Applera affirming dismissal of case alleging fraudulent acquisition
use of DNA sequencing patents.
Conceptus v. Hologic. Represented Conceptus in patent litigation asserting foundational patents for medical implants allowing reversible sterilization.
Neothermia v. Rubicor. Represented Neothermia in patent litigation concerning minimally invasive breast biopsy devices.
Applied Biosystems
Celera Genomics v. Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
Molecular Dynamics. Represented Applied Biosystems
Celera Genomics in multiple patent infringement actions relating to DNA sequencing products.
Applied Materials, Inc. v. ASM International, N.V., et al. Represented Applied Materials in patent litigation involving multiple aspects of semiconductor manufacturing technology.
Applied Materials v. AG, AST, AG v. Applied Materials. Represented Applied Materials in related patent litigations concerning semiconductor manufacturing tools used for rapid thermal processing (RTP).
Novadigm v. Marimba
Marimba v. Novadigm. Represented Marimba in two patent infringement actions involving automated software distribution
updating technology.
Lam Research v. Deshmukh. Represented Applied Materials
Dr. Deshmukh in defense of trade secret misappropriation claims.
Lam Research v. Annapragada. Represented Applied Materials
Dr. Annapragada in defense of trade secret misappropriation claims.
The above representations were h
led by Mr. Brown prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
