AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Valparaiso Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Valparaiso Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Valparaiso Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
  • Serving Valparaiso, FL and Okaloosa County, Florida

  • Law Firm with 1 lawyer2 awards

  • If facing criminal charges in Florida, you want the best Florida criminal defense attorney available. Stephen G. Cobb exclusively practices criminal defense, is a certified... Read More

  • DUI/DWI LawyersCriminal Defense, Assault and Battery, and 31 more

  • Free Consultation

Stephen G. Cobb Esq.
DUI/DWI Lawyer
Compare with other firms
  • Valparaiso, FL 32580-0151

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT
Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our DUI/DWI Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
50 %

 

PEER REVIEWS
4.4

4 Peer Reviews

Commonly Asked DUI/DWI Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Can I be charged with refusal if the officer ticketed me on it?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney John F Brennan (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at Musilli Brennan Associates, PLLC
See an attorney, obviously you have a factual dispute. You'll have to defend yourself if the charges have been made.
See an attorney, obviously you have a factual dispute. You'll have to defend yourself if the charges have been made.

My husband had a DUI in 1998 and a Petty theft in 1999 (with his first wife). He thinks he can't exponged neither DUI nor P.Theft. Pls advice us. Th

Answered by attorney L. Lee Lockett
DUI/DWI lawyer at Lockett Law
Unfortunately DUI convictions cannot be sealed or expunged. That is becasue the person convicted receives an Adjudication of guilt. Unlike many other charges where a person can receive a withhold of Adjudication, the statute in Florida does not allow it. Also, anytime you have been Adjudicated on any offense, you are ineligible to expunge anything else, so the other charges cannot be sealed either.
Unfortunately DUI convictions cannot be sealed or expunged. That is becasue the person convicted receives an Adjudication of guilt. Unlike many other charges where a person can receive a withhold of Adjudication, the statute in Florida does not allow it. Also, anytime you have been Adjudicated on any offense, you are ineligible to expunge anything else, so the other charges cannot be sealed either.
Read More Read Less

Video evidence

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Charles D. Scott (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at The Law Offices of Charles D. Scott PLLC
The video in the intox room is intended to prove that the breath test was administered according to the established rules and procedures. For example, was there a 20 minute observation period?, were you offered a breath test?, did you refuse the breath test?. Anything you may have said in the form of admissions could be used against you.  Miranda applies to interrogation, questions such as "have you been drinking?", how many drinks have you had?", etc.  The video in the intox room may have admissible evidence recorded.  A lawyer could file a motion to suppress evidence if you were being questioned and not read your Miranda rights. If all that happened is that you were shooting the breeze with the officer, probably not any interrogation taking place and as such no need to read Miranda, and nothing harmful on the video. The case law says that you don't need to be read Miranda before taking a breath test because it is not interrogation,  and your are not entitled to a lawyer when making the decision to take or refuse the breath test.
The video in the intox room is intended to prove that the breath test was administered according to the established rules and procedures. For example, was there a 20 minute observation period?, were you offered a breath test?, did you refuse the breath test?. Anything you may have said in the form of admissions could be used against you.  Miranda applies to interrogation, questions such as "have you been drinking?", how many drinks have you had?", etc.  The video in the intox room may have admissible evidence recorded.  A lawyer could file a motion to suppress evidence if you were being questioned and not read your Miranda rights. If all that happened is that you were shooting the breeze with the officer, probably not any interrogation taking place and as such no need to read Miranda, and nothing harmful on the video. The case law says that you don't need to be read Miranda before taking a breath test because it is not interrogation,  and your are not entitled to a lawyer when making the decision to take or refuse the breath test.
Read More Read Less