AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Indian Lake Estates Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Indian Lake Estates Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Indian Lake Estates Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
  • Serving Indian Lake Estates, FL and Polk County, Florida

  • Law Firm with 1 lawyer1 award

  • Criminal Defense Lawyer -- criminal law, VOPs, injunctions, appellate and traffic cases. Over 25 Years Experience.

  • DUI/DWI LawyersCriminal Law, Appellate Practice, and 15 more

  • Free Consultation

Diane Buerger
DUI/DWI Lawyer
Compare with other firms

Lobb & Mohr

4.8
32 Reviews
  • Serving Indian Lake Estates, FL and Polk County, Florida

  • Law Firm with 2 lawyers2 awards

  • Experienced Bartow Attorneys Represent Clients in Criminal Defense, Family Law, & Estate Planning Matters.

  • DUI/DWI LawyersCriminal Law, Assault and Battery, and 28 more

  • Free Consultation

Compare with other firms
  • Serving Indian Lake Estates, FL and Polk County, Florida

  • Law Firm with 2 lawyers2 awards

  • Specializing in Traffic Violations & DUI/DWI Cases. Please Call 877-765-0227

  • DUI/DWI LawyersTraffic Violations, Criminal Law, and 21 more

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT
Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our DUI/DWI Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
90 %

33 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.7

17 Peer Reviews

Commonly Asked DUI/DWI Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Can the DMV over ride court order suspension?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Robert Edward McCall (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at Law Office of Robert E. McCall
There is a difference in a Court ordered suspension and an Administrative suspension by DMV. Short answer is Yes.
There is a difference in a Court ordered suspension and an Administrative suspension by DMV. Short answer is Yes.

At which point does an officer have to read you your rights after being placed under arrest for dui

David William Olson
Answered by attorney David William Olson (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at The Law Offices of David W. Olson
Many folks wrongly but reasonably believe that a police officer must immediately inform an arrested person that he or she has the right to remain silent and other rights.  They are referring to "Miranda" rights, or warnings, which in fact must be provided to an individual by a police officer if two conditions exist: First, the individual must be "in custody."  That doesn't necessarily require handcuffing or the actual restraint of one's physical liberty.  A person is "in custody" if, given all of the attendant circumstances, a reasonable person in the given situation would believe that he or she is not free to leave the presence of the officer.  Secondly, the officer must intend to ask questions of the person who is "in custody." Standard procedure by police in DUI investigations is to not provide Miranda warnings until after "non-testimonial" aspects of the investigation have occurred.  Those would include roadside sobriety tasking and breath, blood or urine gathering.  That is because they know that Miranda warnings may cause an arrested person to not cooperate with that part of the investigation. If a person, without Miranda warnings being provided, at any time during any investigation, states to a police officer that he or she wants to consult with a lawyer, or is unwilling to answer any questions, there can be no interrogation.   So, during the investigation when you mentioned your desire to speak to an attorney, you were then invoking your Constitutional rights to an attorney and to silence.
Many folks wrongly but reasonably believe that a police officer must immediately inform an arrested person that he or she has the right to remain silent and other rights.  They are referring to "Miranda" rights, or warnings, which in fact must be provided to an individual by a police officer if two conditions exist: First, the individual must be "in custody."  That doesn't necessarily require handcuffing or the actual restraint of one's physical liberty.  A person is "in custody" if, given all of the attendant circumstances, a reasonable person in the given situation would believe that he or she is not free to leave the presence of the officer.  Secondly, the officer must intend to ask questions of the person who is "in custody." Standard procedure by police in DUI investigations is to not provide Miranda warnings until after "non-testimonial" aspects of the investigation have occurred.  Those would include roadside sobriety tasking and breath, blood or urine gathering.  That is because they know that Miranda warnings may cause an arrested person to not cooperate with that part of the investigation. If a person, without Miranda warnings being provided, at any time during any investigation, states to a police officer that he or she wants to consult with a lawyer, or is unwilling to answer any questions, there can be no interrogation.   So, during the investigation when you mentioned your desire to speak to an attorney, you were then invoking your Constitutional rights to an attorney and to silence.
Read More Read Less

Can I go to jail for drinking 3 beers and one half a mixed drink without getting pulled over?

Jared Clayton Austin
Answered by attorney Jared Clayton Austin (Unclaimed Profile)
DUI/DWI lawyer at Austin Legal Services, PLC
It is highly unlikely you could be charged with a DUI because they would have to have some evidence of your blood alcohol level at the time you were driving. It would not be enough for them to have a witness to testify to what amount of alcohol you consumed prior to driving a vehicle, even if they had you driving away on tape because they still need your BAC. However, in the future it is not a good idea to drive if you have had more than a couple drinks because the BAC standard for intoxication is so low most people do not realize how quick and easy it is to get to. 08.
It is highly unlikely you could be charged with a DUI because they would have to have some evidence of your blood alcohol level at the time you were driving. It would not be enough for them to have a witness to testify to what amount of alcohol you consumed prior to driving a vehicle, even if they had you driving away on tape because they still need your BAC. However, in the future it is not a good idea to drive if you have had more than a couple drinks because the BAC standard for intoxication is so low most people do not realize how quick and easy it is to get to. 08.
Read More Read Less