×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Booker, TX Divorce Law Firms & Lawyers

3 Results have been found for divorce attorneys in Booker, Texas, belonging to 3 different law firms. Find trusted legal representation by reading our detailed profiles, peer endorsements, and client reviews. Below you will find Booker law firms that provide divorce services. To see attorneys, use the tab below. Showing results for Divorce within 50 miles of Booker, TX
Filter by
Law Firms Lawyers
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Booker Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Booker Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Booker Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

Jackson & Kessie

  • 209 Main Street, Canadian, TX 79014-2212

Lawyers At This Firm

Law Office of Cecil R. Biggers

  • 13 W. Kenneth Avenue, Spearman, TX 79081

The Jarvis Law Office, P.C.

  • 124 West Kenneth Street, Spearman, TX 79081-2028

ADVERTISEMENT
Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

Looking for Divorce Lawyers in Booker?

Divorce lawyers specialize in the legal dissolution of a marriage. They guide clients through the complexities of dividing assets and debts, determining spousal support (alimony), and resolving disputes through negotiation, mediation, or litigation when necessary. These attorneys advocate for their clients’ financial interests to achieve a fair and equitable settlement or court order.

About our Divorce Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
50 %

1 Client Review

PEER REVIEWS
4

 

User Resources

Lawyer Resources

Commonly Asked Divorce Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Is it true that in my divorce decree it states I’m entitled to half of my husband’s retirement if I do not remarry?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney John E. Kirchner (Unclaimed Profile)
Divorce lawyer at John E. Kirchner
That question can only be answered by examination of the divorce decree and the law of the state where it was entered and with more information about what the "retirement" is that you are referring to.
That question can only be answered by examination of the divorce decree and the law of the state where it was entered and with more information about what the "retirement" is that you are referring to.
Read More Read Less

My ex husband is now using drugs and not helping pay the extra things we had agreed upon outside of court can I reopen?

John Joseph Burke
Answered by attorney John Joseph Burke (Unclaimed Profile)
Divorce lawyer at Burke Law Group, PLLC
In the State of Washington, it is very difficult to reopen a finalized divorce for the purpose of changing the financial terms of the divorce; it typically requires strong evidence of a party's fraudulent material misrepresentations to the court. If the reason that no spousal maintenance was ordered was principally based upon the alleged inability of the husband to pay, and the supposed wage discrepancy was very significant, then it might be possible able to have the court reopen the case, but there are time limits to doing so. You need to discuss your particular situation and facts with an attorney to determine if there is any basis for doing so at this time. A divorce does not need to be reopened if there is a real safety issue regarding the children that might justify modifying the parenting plan, or the child support needs to be modified due to the substantial income discrepancy. There are legal parameters that determine when the court can consider making modifications; again, an attorney would be able to assist you in this matter.
In the State of Washington, it is very difficult to reopen a finalized divorce for the purpose of changing the financial terms of the divorce; it typically requires strong evidence of a party's fraudulent material misrepresentations to the court. If the reason that no spousal maintenance was ordered was principally based upon the alleged inability of the husband to pay, and the supposed wage discrepancy was very significant, then it might be possible able to have the court reopen the case, but there are time limits to doing so. You need to discuss your particular situation and facts with an attorney to determine if there is any basis for doing so at this time. A divorce does not need to be reopened if there is a real safety issue regarding the children that might justify modifying the parenting plan, or the child support needs to be modified due to the substantial income discrepancy. There are legal parameters that determine when the court can consider making modifications; again, an attorney would be able to assist you in this matter.
Read More Read Less

Can I bring my new wife without consequence, and then, after I arrive back home, continue to attempt to locate my estranged mate?

Jennifer Maude Oltarsh
Answered by attorney Jennifer Maude Oltarsh
Divorce lawyer at Oltarsh & Associates, P.C.
It does not sound as if there would be any risk as long as you and your former wife are legally divorced.
It does not sound as if there would be any risk as long as you and your former wife are legally divorced.

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions