×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Law Offices of G. Martin Meyers, P.C.Founder
G. Martin Meyers, Esq.
Pro

G. Martin Meyers, Esq.

5.0
2 reviews

35 West Main Street, Suite 106, Denville, NJ 07834 + 1 location

Complex Civil Litigation, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice and 8 more

About G. Martin Meyers, Esq.

G. Martin Meyers, Esq. combines traditional legal credentials with an analytics-driven approach to complex civil litigation. A Wharton B.S. in Economics (Dean’s List, May 1968) and a J.D. from NYU School of Law (May 1971), Mr. Meyers was admitted to the New Jersey bar in November 1971 and has maintained an independent practice since November 1972. He concentrates on representing individuals harmed by injury, fraud, or rights violations, using systematic case analysis, evidence mapping, and precedent-based modeling to evaluate risk and optimize strategy. His career includes recognition from Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers, Avvo, and an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale‑Hubbell, and a notable 1997 $9.9 million jury verdict in Molinaro v. Harley‑Davidson, Inc., later resolved confidentially.

 

G. Martin Meyers, Esq. (Denville, New Jersey) View website

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

G. Martin Meyers, Esq. got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for G. Martin

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
2
Lawyers.com
Not yet reviewed
Martindale
Not yet reviewed
5.0
Avvo
2

Services

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury 1
    • Wrongful Death
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Class Actions
  • Other 7
    • Complex Civil Litigation
    • Securities Litigation
    • Fraud
    • Mass Tort Litigation
    • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
    • Civil
    • Employment & Labor

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Founder
    Firm Name
    Law Offices of G. Martin Meyers, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases

    Wilde v. O’Leary, 374 N.J. Super. 582 (App. Div. 2005)
    Gunter v. Ridgewood Energy Corp., 223 F. 3d 190 (3d Cir. 2000)
    Gunter v. Ridgewood Energy Corp., 32F. Supp. 2d (D.N.J. 1998)
    Gunter v. Ridgewood Energy Corporation, 164 F.R.D. 391 D.N.J. 1996
    Theodore v. Dover Board of Education, 444 A.2d 60 (App. Div. 1982)
    United States Nuclear Energy Regulatory Commission v. Radiation Technology, Inc., 519 F. Supp. 1266 (D.N.J. 1981)
    Zwirn v. County of Hudson, 347 A.2d 822 (Law Div. 1975).

    Kahanovitz v. Electro-Biology, Inc., DOCKET NO. A-5417-11T4, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, 2013 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1917, April 30, 2013.

    Kahanovitz v. Electro-Biology, Inc., DOCKET NO. A-3635-09T3, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, 2011 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 190, October 19, 2010.
  • Additional Links
    https://gmeyerslaw.com/g-martin-meyers/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1971, New Jersey
    Memberships
    The Association of Trial Lawyers of America
    New Jersey Trial Lawyers Association
    National Association of Securities Fraud and Commercial Attorneys.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    New York University
    Class of 1971
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, University of Pennsylvania
    Class of 1968
    B.S.E.
    Legal Certifications
    Certified Civil Trial Attorney, Supreme Court of New Jersey, Board on Trial Attorney Certification
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1946
    New York, N.Y., May 8, 1946

Email G. Martin Meyers, Esq.

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    G. Martin Meyers, Esq. was admitted in 1971 to the State of New Jersey.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, G. Martin Meyers, Esq. has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Law Offices of G. Martin Meyers, P.C. has 3 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    G. Martin Meyers, Esq. attended New York University.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.