×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Deep River, CT Dental Malpractice Law Firms & Lawyers

67 Results have been found for dental malpractice attorneys in Deep River, Connecticut, belonging to 10 different law firms. Find trusted legal representation by reading our detailed profiles, peer endorsements, and client reviews. Below you will find Deep River law firms that provide dental malpractice services. To see attorneys, use the tab below. Showing results for Dental Malpractice within 25 miles of Deep River, CT
Filter by
Law Firms Lawyers
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Deep River Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Deep River Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Deep River Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

Silvester & Kappes

4.7
17 Reviews

  • 300 State St., Ste. 507, New London, CT 06320+1 location

  • Law Firm with 2 lawyers1 award

  • Civil and Criminal Litigation in Connecticut's Courts

  • Dental Malpractice LawyersCriminal Law, DUI/DWI, and 13 more

Robert Forrester Kappes
Dental Malpractice Lawyer
Compare with other firms

Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.

4.7
93 Reviews

  • 195 Church Street, 13th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510+1 location

  • Law Firm with 43 lawyers2 awards

  • Large Firm Experience, Small Firm Flexibility

  • Dental Malpractice LawyersConstruction Law, Employment Law, and 98 more

Deborah Monteith Neubert
Principal
Compare with other firms

Marshall Dennehey

4.6
999 Reviews

  • 700 State Street, New Haven, CT 06511+22 locations

  • Law Firm with 504 lawyers2 awards

  • Marshall Dennehey, founded in 1962, has realized substantial growth in response to our continually expanding client base.We are a defense firm, and our professional practices... Read More

  • Dental Malpractice LawyersDefense Litigation Practice, State Government Law, and 47 more

Charles T. Gura
Dental Malpractice Lawyer
Compare with other firms
ADVERTISEMENT

Law Office of Joseph P. Zeppieri, M.D., J.D.

  • 317 Long Hill Road, Groton, CT 06340

The Bartinik Law Firm, P.C.

  • 1224 Mill Street, East Berlin, CT 06023

Lawyers At This Firm

O'Brien, Tanski & Young, LLP

  • 500 Enterprise Drive, Suite 4B, Rocky Hill, CT 06067

Lawyers At This Firm

Traystman & Coric, LLC

  • 45 Channing St., New London, CT 06320

Law Offices of Michael Bradley

  • 99 Main Street, Norwich, CT 06360

Del Sole & Del Sole, L.L.P.

  • 27 Elm Street, New Haven, CT 06510

Lawyers At This Firm

The Bartinik Law Firm, P.C.

  • 100 Fort Hill Road, Ste 2., Groton, CT 06340

Lawyers At This Firm
Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our Dental Malpractice Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
63 %

25 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.3

1140 Peer Reviews

User Resources

Lawyer Resources

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions