×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPAssociate
no photo
Pro

Steven Laxton

Not yet reviewed

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 5200, Dallas, TX 75201

Intellectual Property Litigation

About Steven Laxton

Steven Laxton is an experienced patent litigation attorney with experience at the intersection of law, technology, and engineering. As an associate in the Intellectual Property Litigation Practice, Steven focuses on complex disputes involving cutting-edge technology, intellectual property enforcement, and technical innovations. He combines robust legal acumen with hands-on technical knowledge, offering strategic approaches tailored to his clients’ needs. His technical experience includes litigation involving electronics, consumer devices, website and mobile application software, and electric hydraulic fracturing.

Steven’s career is distinguished by his ability to bridge the gap between technical complexity and legal strategy. His background enables him to grasp intricate technical details and translate them into compelling legal arguments. This technical background includes academic research at Texas A&M in fiber optics, photonic integrated circuits, micro and nanofabrication, and other device sciences and methods of fabrication.

Prior to joining Greenberg Traurig, Steven gained experience by serving as a judicial law clerk for Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne in the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.

Concentrations

•District court patent litigation
•Post-grant proceedings
•Patent portfolio analysis for acquisition & pre-suit investigation
•Trade secret theft

Judicial Clerkships

•Hon. Roy S. Payne, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 2020-2021

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, 'Ones to Watch,' 2026
•Litigation - Patent
•Patent Law

 

Steven Laxton (Dallas, Texas) View website

Reviews for Steven

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 1
    • Intellectual Property Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Customer service entity: Counsel for customer service entity in inter partes review proceedings.
    Home improvement retailer: Counsel for home improvement retailer in patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Texas. The patented technology included mobile application functionality.
    Banking entity: Counsel for banking entity in several patent infringement cases against various plaintiffs in the Eastern District of Texas. The patented technology included mobile application functionality
    data processing.
    ProFrac: Counsel for ProFrac in pre-acquisition patent portfolio analysis
    potential pre-suit investigations

    several patent infringement cases
    inter partes review proceedings against Halliburton in the Western District of Texas. The patented technology involved electric hydraulic fracturing systems
    methods. The first case went to trial, resulting in findings of non-infringement of every Halliburton patent asserted against ProFrac
    findings of invalidity of nearly every Halliburton patent asserted against ProFrac.
    The above representations were h
    led by Mr. Laxton prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
    Internships: Limited Recognition Practitioner, Lisa Foundation Patent Litigation Clinic, 2018
    Legal Extern, Skysong Innovations (SI), 2018
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/l/laxton-steven

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2020, Texas
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Member, Christian Legal Society, 2017-2019, 2025-Present
    •Member, Federalist Society, 2017-2019, 2025-Present
    •Member, Eastern District of Texas Bar Association, 2020-Present
    •Member, Former Law Clerks of the Eastern District of Texas, 2021-Present
    •Member, Delta Theta Phi, 2017-2019
    •Member, Dallas Bar Association, 2025-Present

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
    Class of 2019
    J.D.
    Editor, Jurimetrics, the Journal of Law, Science, and Technology
    Other Education
    Texas A&M University
    Class of 2017
    M.E.
    Electrical and Computer Engineering, magna cum laude; Specialization in Device Science and Nanotechnology

    Texas A&M University
    Class of 2015
    B.S.
    Electrical and Computer Engineering; Specialization in Power Engineering and Biomedical Imaging

Email Steven Laxton

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Steven Laxton was admitted in 2020 to the State of Texas.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions