AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Middletown Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
Practice Area
Reviews
More Filters
Sort by
Language
Years Established
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Middletown Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Middletown Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

Beck Law P.C.

  • 2681 Cleveland Ave., Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Lawyers At This Firm

Angela Carter Brown Law

  • 435 N. Main St., Lakeport, CA 95453

Tibor E. Major

  • 160 Fifth St., Lakeport, CA 95453

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT

Law Office of Ian Gordon

  • 141 Stony Cir., Ste. 145, Santa Rosa, CA 95401

Roxanne D. Jones

  • 15685 Norton Rd., Healdsburg, CA 95448

Law Office of Judy F. Conard

  • 380 N. Main St., Ste. J, Lakeport, CA 95453

Stephen D. Tulanian Attorney at Law

  • 16285-A Main St., Lower Lake, CA 95457

Law Office of Irma P. Cordova

  • 170 Sotoyome St., Ste. 3, Santa Rosa, CA 95405

Harry A. Allen

  • 50 Old Courthouse Sq., Ste. 406, Santa Rosa, CA 95404-4924

Passalacqua & Passalacqua

  • 152 Piper St., Healdsburg, CA 95448

Lawyers At This Firm

Richard A. Ciummo & Associates

  • 320 College Ave., Ste. 200, Santa Rosa, CA 94559

The Law Offices ofMichael A. Fiumara

  • 182 Farmers Ln., Ste. 100-A, Santa Rosa, CA 95405

Frederick Samuel Raper

  • Lakeport, CA 95453-1219

Law Office of William Conwell

  • 390 North Forbes Street, Lakeport, CA 95453

Evan Livingstone

  • 740 Fourth St., Ste. 215, Santa Rosa, CA 95404

Christine Dubois

  • Santa Rosa, CA 95402

Law Office of Lamar Peckham

  • 555 Sebastopol Rd., Ste. C, Santa Rosa, CA 95407

Carter & Carter

  • 9667 Hwy. 29, Ste. 102, Lower Lake, CA 95457

Douglas Edward Rhoades

  • 200 N. Main St., Lakeport, CA 95453

Wilber Law Offices PC

  • 703 2nd StreetSuite 351, Santa Rosa, CA 95404

Law Offices of L. Stephen Turer

  • 610 Davis Street, Santa Rosa, CA 95401

The Constance Burtnett Law Firm

  • 2777 Yulupa Ave., Ste. 350, Santa Rosa, CA 95405

Schaps Law Office of

  • 9667 Highway 29, Ste. 203-A, Lower Lake, CA 95457

Law Offices of Peter A. Duarte

  • 1400 N. Dutton Ave., Ste. 21, Santa Rosa, CA 95401

Law Office of Anna Gregorian

  • 301 N. Forbes St., Lakeport, CA 95453

Crump Bruchler & La Velle

  • 1175-C N. Main St., Lakeport, CA 95453

J. David Markham Attorney at Law

  • 380 N. Main Street, Suite G, Lakeport, CA 95453-4845

Ewing & Associates

  • 995 S. Main St., Lakeport, CA 95453

Lawyers At This Firm
Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our Criminal Law Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
77 %

44 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.1

117 Peer Reviews

User Resources

Lawyer Resources

Commonly Asked Criminal Law Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

If an officer coerced my son into allowing him to search the car, can we fight this?

Cynthia Russell Henley
Answered by attorney Cynthia Russell Henley (Unclaimed Profile)
Criminal Law lawyer at Cynthia Henley
Hire a lawyer. The officer did not "illegally" coerce him such that it would lead to a suppression. However, if your son kept quiet, it sounds like they may have a proof issue in showing he intentionally and knowingly possessed the alcohol.
Hire a lawyer. The officer did not "illegally" coerce him such that it would lead to a suppression. However, if your son kept quiet, it sounds like they may have a proof issue in showing he intentionally and knowingly possessed the alcohol.
Read More Read Less

Will I still have to go to court if someone got charged for having weed in their car when I was there?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Lawrence Lewis (Unclaimed Profile)
Criminal Law lawyer at Lawrence Lewis, P.C.
You will be sent a notice IF you are needed in court. As soon as you receive a court notice you need to consult with an experienced attorney.
You will be sent a notice IF you are needed in court. As soon as you receive a court notice you need to consult with an experienced attorney.

What happens if one individual obtains relief on habeas corpus?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Jared Christian Winter (Unclaimed Profile)
Criminal Law lawyer at Law Office of Jared C. Winter
Unfortunately, the law very rarely provides clear cut answers to questions. It's not possible for anyone on here to give you a definitive "yes or no" answer to your question. It would take a considerable amount of legal research and a detailed analysis of the facts and evidence in the case to render a proper legal opinion. But I can give you my initial impression. I do not believe that a Brady violation against one defendant necessarily means there was a Brady violation against all defendants. Brady violations occur when the prosecution fails to turn over exculpatory evidence. If they withheld evidence for once defendant, it does not automatically mean that that evidence would have been exculpatory for all defendants.
Unfortunately, the law very rarely provides clear cut answers to questions. It's not possible for anyone on here to give you a definitive "yes or no" answer to your question. It would take a considerable amount of legal research and a detailed analysis of the facts and evidence in the case to render a proper legal opinion. But I can give you my initial impression. I do not believe that a Brady violation against one defendant necessarily means there was a Brady violation against all defendants. Brady violations occur when the prosecution fails to turn over exculpatory evidence. If they withheld evidence for once defendant, it does not automatically mean that that evidence would have been exculpatory for all defendants.
Read More Read Less