×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Frenchtown, MT Construction Defects Law Firms & Lawyers

39 Results have been found for construction defects attorneys in Frenchtown, Montana, belonging to 4 different law firms. Find trusted legal representation by reading our detailed profiles, peer endorsements, and client reviews. Below you will find Frenchtown law firms that provide construction defects services. To see attorneys, use the tab below.
Filter by
Law Firms Lawyers
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Frenchtown Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Frenchtown Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Frenchtown Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

Moulton Bellingham PC

4.6
134 Reviews

  • Serving Frenchtown, MT and Missoula County, Montana

  • Law Firm with 19 lawyers2 awards

  • The philosophy of the firm is simple: We will not over-staff or over-lawyer a matter, and we will not engage in make-work representation.

  • Construction Defects LawyersGeneral, Trial Practice, and 158 more

Adam Warren
Construction Defects Lawyer
Compare with other firms

Ugrin, Alexander, Zadick, P.C.

4.9
32 Reviews

  • Serving Frenchtown, MT and Missoula County, Montana

  • Law Firm with 8 lawyers1 award

  • Ugrin, Alexander, Zadick & Higgins, P.C. is primarily a litigation firm located in Great Falls, Montana. We also represent clients in Billings, Bozeman, Butte, Havre, Helena,... Read More

  • Construction Defects LawyersGeneral Trial Practice, Federal Practice, and 90 more

  • Free Consultation

Gary M. Zadick
Member
Compare with other firms

Stacey & Funyak

4.7
2 Reviews

  • Serving Frenchtown, MT and Missoula County, Montana

  • Law Firm with 3 lawyers1 award

  • Experienced Trial Counsel

  • Construction Defects LawyersCivil Litigation, General Trial and Appellate Practice, and 47 more

  • Free Consultation

Kevin Funyak
Partner
Compare with other firms
ADVERTISEMENT

Williams Law Firm, P.C.

4.6
85 Reviews

  • Serving Frenchtown, MT and Missoula County, Montana

  • Law Firm with 9 lawyers1 award

  • We have a state wide practice involving complex civil litigation and trial work.

  • Construction Defects LawyersBusiness Litigation, General, and 12 more

James D. Johnson
Construction Defects Lawyer
Compare with other firms
Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our Construction Defects Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
50 %

1 Client Review

PEER REVIEWS
4.7

252 Peer Reviews

User Resources

Lawyer Resources

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions