no photo

About Matthew John Burkhart

Matthew John Burkhart is a lawyer practicing trial practice, business/commercial litigation, insurance coverage litigation and 11 other areas of law. Matthew received a B.A. degree from Wittenberg University, and has been licensed for 29 years. Matthew practices in Columbus, OH.

Awards

Reviews for Matthew

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation 1
    • Trial Practice
  • Business Law 1
    • Business/Commercial Litigation
  • Insurance 2
    • Insurance Coverage Litigation
    • Insurance Coverage
  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Trademark/Trade Secret
  • Aviation Law
  • Class Actions
  • Health Care 1
    • Health Care Litigation
  • Personal Injury 1
    • Wrongful Death
  • Real Estate 1
    • Real Property
  • Other 2
    • Employment Disputes
    • Professional Responsibility

Practice Details

  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    FEATURED CASES

    Mount Carmel Health Systems

    While at Bailey Cavalieri, Matt was part of a trial team for Mount Carmel Health Systems in an arbitration that resulted in an award requiring United Healthcare of Ohio to pay Mount Carmel over $34,000,000.

    Arch Insurance Company

    In Continental Cas. Co. v. Auto Plus Ins. Agency, LLC, No. 3:08-cv-01889 (N.D. Ohio filed Aug. 6, 2008), Matt sought summary judgment on the causes of action against his client, Arch Insurance Company. The Plaintiff wholly ab
    oned its causes of action following a review of the motion Matt filed.

    St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company

    Matt represented St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company in Miller v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 2009 WL 6417804 (D. Md. Mar. 24, 2009) in which a $3 million dollar insurance policy was at stake. As counsel for St. Paul, Matt moved to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint. Notwithst
    ing the plaintiff's arguments that the policy was ambiguous
    violated public policy, the Court dismissed the complaint
    found his arguments to be frivolous.

    Old Republic Insurance Company

    In HLTH Corp. v. Clarendon Nat'l Ins. Co., 2009 Del. Super. LEXIS 437 (Super. Ct. Del. July 15, 2009), the court granted Old Republic's motion for summary judgment filed by Matt on Old Republic's behalf
    enforced a policy exclusion barring coverage under Old Republic's $15 million insurance policy. Had the Court found coverage, Old Republic would have had to pay the entire $15 million to cover the plaintiff's defense costs incurred in an underlying lawsuit.

    Old Republic Insurance Company

    In Axis Reins. Co. v. HLTH Corp., 2010 Del. LEXIS 183 (Del. Supreme Ct. Apr. 22, 2010), the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's award of summary judgment to Old Republic on prior notice grounds
    reversed the trial court's denial of summary judgment on prior acts grounds. As a result, Old Republic avoided having to pay any of its $10 million policy which otherwise would have been exhausted by defense costs.

    Federal Insurance Company

    In Castelli v. Patmon, No. CV-02-481994 (Mar. 12, 2007), Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. moved to dismiss the plaintiff's amended complaint, which sought to impose on Executive Risk the liability of its insured. After reviewing the motion to dismiss, the Court sua sponte denied the plaintiff's attempt to amend the complaint, which ended any possibility of recovery against Matt's client.

    St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company

    In Bank of Soperton v. FirstCity Bank, No. 09-CV-2613 (Ga. Super. Ct. filed June 29, 2009)
    First Citizens Bank v. FirstCity Bank, No. 09-CV-2612 (Ga. Super. Ct. filed June 29, 2009), St. Paul moved to dismiss the plaintiff's two direct-action complaints seeking insurance coverage under St. Paul's $1 million insurance policy. After reviewing the motions, the plaintiffs (represented by common counsel) dismissed its claims against St. Paul.

    Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company

    In Franz v. Allegheny Investments, Ltd., No. 1:08-cv-01983 (N.D. Ohio filed Aug. 15, 2008), the plaintiff ab
    oned its claims against Westchester (seeking coverage under the $3 million insurance policy issued by Westchester) immediately following a hearing before the Judge during which the merits of Ace's yet-to-be-filed motion for summary judgment were argued.

    Old Republic Insurance Company

    In Connolly, Plan Admin. for SONICblue Inc. v. Admiral Ins. Co., et al., 2010 WL 2034798 (N.D. Cal. May 19, 2010), the court granted Old Republic's motion for summary judgment finding that Old Republic had no obligation to the SONICblue Plan Administrator.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1997, Ohio
    2001, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
    2004, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
    2007, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
    2010, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    Memberships
    Columbus Bar Association
    Ohio Bar Association
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    The University of Virginia School of Law
    Class of 1997
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Wittenberg University
    B.A.
    Political Science

    Wittenberg University
    B.A.
    summa cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Hobbies & Interests
    Upper Arlington Lutheran Church Council Upper Arlington Lutheran Church worship team drummer Assistant Coach, Bearcub Baseball
Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number: