×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Atty. Stephen Patrick Ellenbecker

Atty. Stephen Patrick Ellenbecker

Not yet reviewed

33 West Monroe Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL 60603-5404

Complex / Catastrophic, Product Liability, General Negligence and 4 more

About Atty. Stephen Patrick Ellenbecker

Atty. Stephen Patrick Ellenbecker is a lawyer practicing complex / catastrophic, product liability, general negligence and 4 other areas of law. Stephen received a B.S.E. degree from University of Wisconsin-Whitewater in 1994, and has been licensed for 24 years. Stephen practices at Johnson & Bell, Ltd. in Chicago, IL.

Atty. Stephen Patrick Ellenbecker (Chicago, Illinois)

Reviews for Stephen

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Construction Law
  • Other 5
    • Complex / Catastrophic
    • Product Liability
    • General Negligence
    • School & University Liability
    • Toxic Tort

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Johnson & Bell, Ltd.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Cases: Sutrick v. BayCare Aurora, LLC., et al. (No. 14-cv-1521), Brown County, WI.
    Jones v. Fairbank Farms., et al. (Nos. 1:11-cv-437), District of Maine E. Coli related litigation - May 2014
    Long/Smith v. Fairbank Farms, et al (Nos. 1:09-cv-00592-GZS
    2:10-cv-60-GZS)
    District of Maine E. Coli related litigation - November, 2011
    May, 2014
    Eichenberg v. Castillo et al (No. 04 L 3715) Cook County, IL
    As Plaintiff's counsel - Plaintiff verdict of $1.7 million. September, 2011
    Clinger v. The Lincoln Electric Company, et al (No. 1:04-cv-17118) Northern District Ohio
    Defense verdict. October, 2010
    Haskell v. ESAB, et al (No. 04-L-1152) Madison County, IL
    Defense verdict. November, 2006.
    Boren v. A.O. Smith, et al (No. 01-L-786) Madison County, IL
    Defense verdict. December, 2005.
    Hale v. T.R. Streeterville Hotel Corp. (No. 02-L-4975) Cook County, IL
    Judgement of 10% that asked
    dem
    ed. April, 2004.
    Baltazar v. Advanced Healthcare Associates (U.S. Court of Appeals for Seventh Circuit)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2002, Illinois
    United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
    United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
    United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin
    2015, Wisconsin Supreme Court
    2008, Indiana
    Memberships

    Affiliations

    Vice Chair of the American Bar Association's TIPS-Product Liability section
    American Bar Association
    American Boat & Yacht Council

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Illinois Institute of Technology
    Class of 2002
    J.D.
    with honors
    Other Education
    University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
    Class of 1994
    B.S.E.

Atty. Stephen Patrick Ellenbecker

Share Holder at Johnson & Bell, Ltd.
Not yet reviewed

33 West Monroe Street, Suite 2700Chicago, IL 60603-5404U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Edmund P. Boland
Pro
Edmund P. Boland
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer
312-675-8296
View Profile
John Dearden Donlevy
Pro
John Dearden Donlevy
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer
224-312-2439
View Profile
David Rapoport
Pro
David Rapoport
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

224-801-5578
View Profile
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
Pro
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
5.0
69
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

312-535-4941
View Profile
Gregory G. Vacala
Pro
Gregory G. Vacala
4.4
1
General Practice lawyer
312-796-6938
View Profile

Email Atty. Stephen Patrick Ellenbecker

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions