Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLCPartner

no photo

About Robert Philip Greenspoon

Robert Philip Greenspoon is a lawyer practicing patent litigation, intellectual property litigation, intellectual property licensing and 2 other areas of law. Robert received a A.B. degree from University of Chicago in 1992, and has been licensed for 31 years. Robert practices at Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC in Chicago, IL.

Awards

Reviews for Robert

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Intellectual Property Licensing
  • Other 4
    • Patent Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Contract Litigation
    • Copyright Litigation

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    D'Agostino v. MasterCard Int'l, __ F.3d __, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 23025 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 22, 2016) (argued
    won vacating
    rem
    of Patent Trial
    Appeal Board inter partes review patent invalidation)
    Medtronic v. Lifeport Sciences, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11262 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2016) (argued
    won affirmance of patent confirmation by Patent Trial
    Appeal Board in inter partes review)
    Computer Software Protection v. Adobe Systems, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5335 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 14, 2016) (argued
    won affirmance of denial of § 285 exceptional case attorneys fee shifting)
    Zayed v. Associated Bank, 779 F.3d 727 (8th Cir. 2015) (argued
    won reversal
    rem
    of dismissal of aiding-
    -abetting case against a bank for its role in a $190 million Ponzi scheme)
    FTC v. Ross, 743 F.3d 886 (4th Cir. 2014), cert. denied (challenged statutory authority of the FTC to seek monetary remedies under Section 13(b))
    1st Media v. Electronic Arts, 694 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 418 (2013) (argued
    won reversal of inequitable conduct judgment)
    1st Technology v. Rational Enterprises, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21721 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (argued
    won affirmance without opinion of $50 million judgment)
    HyperPhrase Technologies, LLC v. Google, Inc., 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29796 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (argued
    won reversal-in-part for patentee of summary judgment of noninfringement)
    IMS Technology, Inc. v. Haas Automation, Inc., 206 F.3d 1422 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (argued
    won reversal for patentee of summary judgment of noninfringement).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1995, Illinois
    2019, U.S. District Court, Western District of New York
    2019, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    1995, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    1996, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
    1998, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan and U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
    2000, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    2001, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
    2002, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
    2003, U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin
    2009, U.S. Supreme Court
    2012, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    2014, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
    1998, Minnesota
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Michigan
    Class of 1995
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Chicago
    Class of 1992
    A.B.
    Physics
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1970
    January 16, 1970
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: