Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLPPartner

Patrick Vincent Dahlstrom

About Patrick Vincent Dahlstrom

Patrick Vincent Dahlstrom is a lawyer practicing antitrust / trade law, class action, securities & investment fraud and 1 other area of law. Patrick received a A.B. degree from Xavier University in 1978, and has been licensed for 38 years. Patrick practices at Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP in Chicago, IL.

Reviews for Patrick

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 4
    • Antitrust / Trade Law
    • Class Action
    • Securities & Investment Fraud
    • Securities Litigation

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Contingency Fee: 15% - 33%
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1988, New York
    1999, Illinois
    U.S. District Court for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the Northern District of Illinois, the Northern District of Indiana, the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the District of Colorado, the Western District of Pennsylvania
    U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fourth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Circuits
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Bar Fellowship
    Editor in Chief of the Administrative Law Journal, a member of the Moot Court Board representing Washington College of Law in the New York County Bar Association's Antitrust Moot Court Competition, and a member of the Vietnam Veterans of America Legal Services/Public Interest Law Clinic. Upon graduating, Mr. Dahlstrom served as the Pro Se Staff Attorney for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and was a law clerk to the Honorable Joan M. Azrack, United States Magistrate Judge.

    Mr. Dahlstrom is a member of the Firm's Institutional Investor Practice and New Case Groups. He is the partner-in-charge in many of the Firms' pending securities fraud class actions on behalf of institutional lead plaintiffs, including Comverse and In re Sealed Air Securities Litig., No. 03-cv-437 (D.N.J.). Examples of other notable litigations by Mr. Dahlstrom include In re Safety-Kleen Stockholders Securities Litigation (as co-lead counsel, Firm obtained $54.5 million settlement); and In re Woolworth Corporation Securities Class Action Litigation (Firm, as co-lead counsel, secured a $20 million settlement).

    Mr. Dahlstrom's extensive experience in litigation under the PSLRA has made him an expert not only at making compelling arguments on behalf of Pomerantz's clients for lead plaintiff status, but also in discerning weaknesses of competing candidates. In re American Italian Pasta Co. Sec. Litigation and Comverse are the most recent examples of his success in getting clients appointed sole lead plaintiff despite competing motions by numerous impressive institutional clients. After appointing Pomerantz as sole lead counsel in In re American Italian Pasta Co. Sec. Litigation, the court stated:

    Pomerantz has significant experience (and has been extremely effective) litigating securities class actions, employs several highly qualified attorneys, and possesses ample resources to effectively manage the class litigation and protect the class's interests.

    Mr. Dahlstrom was also a member of the trial team in In re ICN/Viratek Securities Litigation (S.D.N.Y.), which, after trial, settled for $14.5 million. Judge Wood praised the trial team:

    [P]laintiffs counsel did a superb job here on behalf of the class . . . This was a very hard fought case. You had very able, superb opponents, and they put you to your task . . . The trial work was beautifully done and I believe very efficiently done.

    In approving the $225 million settlement in In re Comverse Technology Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 06-CV-1825 (E.D.N.Y.) in June 2010, Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis stated:

    The court also notes that, throughout this litigation, it has been impressed by Lead Counsel's acumen and diligence. The briefing has been thorough, clear, and convincing, and . . . Lead Counsel has not taken short cuts or relaxed its efforts at any stage of the litigation. Fellow: Editor in Chief of the Administrative Law Journal, a member of the Moot Court Board representing Washington College of Law in the New York County Bar Association's Antitrust Moot Court Competition, and a member of the Vietnam Veterans of America Legal Services/Public Interest Law Clinic. Upon graduating, Mr. Dahlstrom served as the Pro Se Staff Attorney for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and was a law clerk to the Honorable Joan M. Azrack, United States Magistrate Judge.

    Mr. Dahlstrom is a member of the Firm's Institutional Investor Practice and New Case Groups. He is the partner-in-charge in many of the Firms' pending securities fraud class actions on behalf of institutional lead plaintiffs, including Comverse and In re Sealed Air Securities Litig., No. 03-cv-437 (D.N.J.). Examples of other notable litigations by Mr. Dahlstrom include In re Safety-Kleen Stockholders Securities Litigation (as co-lead counsel, Firm obtained $54.5 million settlement); and In re Woolworth Corporation Securities Class Action Litigation (Firm, as co-lead counsel, secured a $20 million settlement).

    Mr. Dahlstrom's extensive experience in litigation under the PSLRA has made him an expert not only at making compelling arguments on behalf of Pomerantz's clients for lead plaintiff status, but also in discerning weaknesses of competing candidates. In re American Italian Pasta Co. Sec. Litigation and Comverse are the most recent examples of his success in getting clients appointed sole lead plaintiff despite competing motions by numerous impressive institutional clients. After appointing Pomerantz as sole lead counsel in In re American Italian Pasta Co. Sec. Litigation, the court stated:

    Pomerantz has significant experience (and has been extremely effective) litigating securities class actions, employs several highly qualified attorneys, and possesses ample resources to effectively manage the class litigation and protect the class's interests.

    Mr. Dahlstrom was also a member of the trial team in In re ICN/Viratek Securities Litigation (S.D.N.Y.), which, after trial, settled for $14.5 million. Judge Wood praised the trial team:

    [P]laintiffs counsel did a superb job here on behalf of the class . . . This was a very hard fought case. You had very able, superb opponents, and they put you to your task . . . The trial work was beautifully done and I believe very efficiently done.

    In approving the $225 million settlement in In re Comverse Technology Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 06-CV-1825 (E.D.N.Y.) in June 2010, Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis stated:

    The court also notes that, throughout this litigation, it has been impressed by Lead Counsel's acumen and diligence. The briefing has been thorough, clear, and convincing, and . . . Lead Counsel has not taken short cuts or relaxed its efforts at any stage of the litigation.

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Washington College of Law - American University
    Class of 1987
    J.D.
    1987 Dean's Fellow

    Washington College of Law - American University
    Class of 1987
    J.D.
    Editor in Chief

    Washington College of Law - American University
    Class of 1987
    J.D.
    Administrative Law Journal
    Other Education
    Xavier University
    Class of 1978
    A.B.
    Scholars Curriculum

Patrick Vincent Dahlstrom

Partner at Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP
Not yet reviewed

10 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505Chicago, IL 60603U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Kurt Edward Hanson
Pro
Kurt Edward Hanson
4.4
General Practice lawyer
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
Pro
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
5.0
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
Pro
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
5.0
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

Peter Ordower
Pro
Peter Ordower
5.0
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

Marc J. Chalfen
Pro
Marc J. Chalfen
4.4
General Practice lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: