×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Nada Jurich Ardeleanu

Nada Jurich Ardeleanu

Not yet reviewed

120 S. La Salle St., Ste. 1600, Chicago, IL 60603-3402

Intellectual Property, Patent Prosecution, Chemical Intellectual Property and 4 more

About Nada Jurich Ardeleanu

Nada Jurich Ardeleanu is a lawyer practicing intellectual property, patent prosecution, chemical intellectual property and 4 other areas of law. Nada received a B.S. degree from University of Minnesota in 1996, and has been licensed for 20 years. Nada practices at Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP in Chicago, IL.

Nada Jurich Ardeleanu (Chicago, Illinois)

Reviews for Nada

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property
  • Other 6
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Chemical Intellectual Property
    • Mechanical Intellectual Property
    • Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Intellectual Property
    • Trademark Infringement
    • Copyright Infringement

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Serbian
    Romanian
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2006, Illinois
    registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 2003
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Chicago-Kent College of Law
    Class of 2005
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Minnesota
    Class of 1996
    B.S.
    Chemical Engineering

    University of Minnesota
    Class of 1996
    B.S.
    minor in Chemistry
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    St. Paul, Minnesota, November 25, 1974

Nada Jurich Ardeleanu

Associate at Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP
Not yet reviewed

120 S. La Salle St., Ste. 1600Chicago, IL 60603-3402U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Robert Richard Duda, Jr.
Pro
Robert Richard Duda, Jr.
5.0
9
Intellectual Property lawyer
872-336-0724
View Profile
Terry J. Smith
Pro
Terry J. Smith
5.0
5
Intellectual Property lawyer
872-336-0851
View Profile
Peter Ordower
Pro
Peter Ordower
5.0
17
Intellectual Property lawyer

Free Consultation

312-481-8617
View Profile
Erin Kathryn Russell
Pro
Erin Kathryn Russell
4.7
24
Intellectual Property lawyer

Free Consultation

224-836-1454
View Profile
Craig R. Miles
Pro
Craig R. Miles
4.9
8
Intellectual Property lawyer
970-286-0899
View Profile

Email Nada Jurich Ardeleanu

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions