×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Jordan Douglas Shea

Jordan Douglas Shea

Not yet reviewed

233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6800, Chicago, IL 60606

Commercial Litigation, Product Liability and Commercial Real Estate

About Jordan Douglas Shea

Jordan Douglas Shea is a lawyer practicing commercial litigation, product liability, commercial real estate. Jordan received a B.A. degree from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2003, and has been licensed for 19 years. Jordan practices at Williams Barber & Morel Ltd. in Chicago, IL.

Jordan Douglas Shea (Chicago, Illinois)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Jordan Douglas Shea got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Jordan

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Law 1
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Products Liability 1
    • Product Liability
  • Commercial Real Estate

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Williams Barber & Morel Ltd.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A. v. Kinnavy v. Chiquita Br
    s International: Successfully defended former employee of Del Monte
    Chiquita Br
    s in trade secret, nondisclosure agreement
    non-compete lawsuit with client awarded full defense costs through corporate advancement
    indemnity.
    Quality Egg National Class Action: Represented seller of eggs following recall of 380 million eggs in a highly publicized national class action alleging salmonella poisoning. Plaintiffs' counsel dismissed case
    never refiled after we requested severe sanctions for misconduct.
    False Claims Act Victory: Secured $85 million settlement on behalf of the U.S. government representing qui tam plaintiff after the United States declined to intervene in case involving Medicare
    Medicaid fraud through unreported kickbacks to medical providers.
    Whirlpool Corporation v. Sensata Technologies, Inc.
    Texas Instruments Inc.: Represented consumer product manufacturer Whirlpool in product liability lawsuit brought against supplier to recover damages caused by recall of 1.8 million refrigerators. Successfully resolved on eve of trial.
    Chicago Police Board Administrative Hearings: Represented the City of Chicago in full administrative trials against police officers accused of misconduct, including high-profile cases of officers accused of issuing harassing
    fraudulent parking tickets, known in the media as 'ticketgate,'
    officers accused of covering up bribes from tow-truck drivers, as revealed in FBI probe.
    Equal Pay Act Trial: Achieved jury verdict in favor of employer on claim brought under Equal Pay Act
    won summary judgment on Title VII sex discrimination claim.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2007, Illinois State Bar
    U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (including the trial bar)
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana
    2007, Illinois
    Memberships

    International Association of Defense Counsel
    Defense Research Institute
    Chicago Bar Association
    Loyola Academy Bar Association.

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Loyola University Chicago School of Law
    Class of 2007
    J.D.
    magna cum laude
    Other Education
    University of Wisconsin-Madison
    Class of 2003
    B.A.
    History
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1981
    1981

Jordan Douglas Shea

Partner at Williams Barber & Morel Ltd.
Not yet reviewed

233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6800Chicago, IL 60606U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

William S. Wigoda
Pro
William S. Wigoda
3.0
12
Commercial Litigation lawyer
224-561-1256
View Profile
Robert B. Talan
Pro
Robert B. Talan
4.2
1
Commercial Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

312-473-3277
View Profile
Mark J. Rose
Pro
Mark J. Rose
4.8
10
Commercial Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

224-452-5897
View Profile
Gregory G. Vacala
Pro
Gregory G. Vacala
4.4
1
Commercial Litigation lawyer
312-796-6938
View Profile
Christopher Bargione
Pro
Christopher Bargione
4.7
2
Commercial Litigation lawyer
224-561-4329
View Profile

Email Jordan Douglas Shea

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions