Jackson Lewis P.C.Office Managing Principal

Jane Marie McFetridge

About Jane Marie McFetridge

Jane Marie McFetridge is a lawyer practicing advice and counsel, class actions and complex litigation, disability, leave and health management and 8 other areas of law. Jane received a B.S. degree from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1980, and has been licensed for 36 years. Jane practices at Jackson Lewis P.C. in Chicago, IL.

Awards

Reviews for Jane Marie McFetridge

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
July 13, 2010
Hired Attorney Jane Marie McFetridge

Great service.

Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
March 03, 2015
Hired Attorney Jane Marie McFetridge

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Other 10
    • Advice and Counsel
    • Class Actions and Complex Litigation
    • Disability, Leave and Health Management
    • COVID-19
    • Pay Equity
    • Healthcare
    • Disabilities Act
    • Hospitality
    • Appeals
    • Retail

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Office Managing Principal
    Firm Name
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Selected Trial Experience: Kirkpatrick v. Pfizer, Inc. (U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma). This case involved age discrimination claims brought by a former sales representative. After a week of trial, a directed verdict was entered for the defendant.
    Harvey v. Wolfram, et.al. (Illinois Circuit Court of the 18th Judicial Circuit (DuPage County)). This case involved claims for breach of contract, fraud,
    various forms of equitable relief brought by a former high level executive who asserted she had left a lucrative consulting career to become employed by one of the defendants based on assurances that she would be given an equity interest in the business,
    that she was terminated to avoid the company's obligation in that regard. After a two
    a half week trial, the jury returned a defense verdict on all counts.
    Romano v. Gr
    Victoria Casino (Illinois Circuit Court of the 16th Judicial Circuit (Kane County)). This case involved defamation
    intentional infliction of emotional distress claims brought by a former employee against a casino
    its Director of Human Resources. A verdict was rendered for both defendants.
    Morgan v. Insight Communications (Urbana Human Relations Commission). This case involved race discrimination claims brought by a former employee against a cable
    internet service provider. After a three week trial, the complainant settled for a nominal sum, significantly less than the amount dem
    ed throughout the litigation to that point.
    Atkins v. Gr
    Victoria Casino (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois). This case involved failure to hire on the basis of race claims brought by an unsuccessful applicant for a dealer position at a casino. Judgment was rendered for the defendant.
    Fortier v. AT&T (Illinois Circuit Court of the 1st Judicial Circuit (Cook County)). This case involved breach of employment contract claims brought by a former Director of Human Resources, who was also an attorney responsible for corporate diversity issues. Directed verdict was entered for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff's case.
    Schuster v. Shepard Motors (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois). This case involved age discrimination claims brought by the former general manager of a large automobile dealership. The case settled for a nominal sum during the course of the trial.
    Scalera v. Village of Oak Park (Illinois Human Relations Commission). This case involved claims of national origin
    age discrimination brought by a former Public Works employee against a municipality. Judgment was rendered for the respondent employer.
    Selected Class
    Collective Action Experience: Miller, et al. v. Equinox (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois). This action was brought against a chain of health clubs by a former membership advisor who asserted, on behalf of herself
    others, that membership advisors did not receive commission as that term is defined under the Fair Labor St
    ards Act
    that, accordingly, they were non-exempt employees entitled to overtime. After plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification, Defendant pursued an aggressive defensive strategy. Plaintiff was forced to voluntarily dismiss the case, with no money paid by Defendant.
    Allen, et al. v. Harrah's (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana). This action was brought against a casino by approximately 60 table game supervisors who claimed they were not exempt employees
    thus entitled to overtime
    that they had been inappropriately subjected to
    denied banked vacation
    overtime. Defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted.
    Ellis, et al. v. Gr
    Victoria Casino (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois). This action was brought by African American dealer applicants who claimed they were subject to racially discriminatory hiring practices. Defendant's motion to de-certify the class was granted. Almost all resultant individual claims concluded in summary judgment being granted to defendant. One individual claim was settled for a nominal sum
    another was tied to a verdict for the defendant.
    EEOC v. Village of Oak Park (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois). This age discrimination claim was brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on behalf of firefighters who had been denied promotions. The case settled for a very nominal amount on the eve of trial.
    Betts, et al. v. Sundstr
    (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Western Division). This case was brought by African American applicants
    employees alleging failure to hire
    to promote on the basis of race. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification was defeated.
    Roman, Yepez, et al. v. Allegis, et al. (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Chicago District Office). This case was brought by a group of temporary workers alleging national origin discrimination resulting from an English only m
    ate at a manufacturing facility. Protracted settlement discussions resulted in a favorable settlement for the temporary service provider before suit was filed in federal court.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1989, Illinois
    1989, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    1996, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    2001, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana
    2003, U.S. District Court, Central and Southern District of Illinois
    2005, U.S. Supreme Court
    2007, U.S. District Court, Eastern and Districts of Wisconsin and U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana
    2011, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eight Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Memberships

    Professional Associations and Activities

    •American Bar Association's National Institute on Sexual Harassment, Faculty Member
    •Defense Research Institute, Employment Law Committee Member, 2004 Annual Employment Law Seminar Program Chair

    Published Works

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Northwestern University School of Law
    Class of 1989
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    Class of 1980
    B.S.
    Accounting with Honors James Scholar
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1958
    1958

Jane Marie McFetridge

Office Managing Principal at Jackson Lewis P.C.
5.0
2 reviews

150 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 2500Chicago, IL 60601U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Edmund P. Boland
Pro
Edmund P. Boland
5.0
General Practice lawyer
David Rapoport
Pro
David Rapoport
5.0
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

John Dearden Donlevy
Pro
John Dearden Donlevy
5.0
General Practice lawyer
Kurt Edward Hanson
Pro
Kurt Edward Hanson
4.4
General Practice lawyer
Marc J. Chalfen
Pro
Marc J. Chalfen
4.4
General Practice lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: