×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPAssociate
no photo
Pro

Erik M. Bokar

Not yet reviewed

77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3100, Chicago, IL 60601

Intellectual Property & Technology and Intellectual Property Litigation

About Erik M. Bokar

Erik is an associate in Greenberg Traurig’s Intellectual Property Litigation Practice. Erik’s practice primarily focuses on patent litigation and competitive intellectual property analysis, clearance, and opinions. Erik has deep litigation experience in all phases of federal district court litigation. Erik has also represented clients before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and U.S. International Trade Commission. He has also litigated numerous other complex intellectual property cases involving standard essential patents, copyrights and trade secrets.

Erik has represented clients in diverse industries and technologies, including augmented reality, software and computer systems, signaling and wireless communications, navigation and infotainment systems, UAVs, turbomachinery, optics, food processing, household appliances, battery technology, consumer electronics, lawn and power equipment, construction hardware and tools, and medical devices.

Concentrations

•Patent, trade secret, trademark, and copyright litigation
•Patent appeals
•Post-issuance patent proceedings, including inter partes review and ex parte reexamination
•Freedom-to-operate, patentability, and infringement opinions
•Patent licensing and due diligence

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, 'Ones to Watch,' 2025-2026
•Intellectual Property Law, 2025- 2026
•Litigation - Intellectual Property, 2026
•Litigation - Patent, 2026

 

Erik M. Bokar (Chicago, Illinois) View website

Reviews for Erik

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 2
    • Intellectual Property & Technology
    • Intellectual Property Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Representation of a battery-powered tool manufacturer in the enforcement of a nine-patent infringement action involving lawn mower technology.
    Representation of an augmented reality solutions company in the enforcement of a seven-patent infringement action involving the application of augmented reality in video game experiences.
    Representation of a global vehicle manufacturer in the defense of a six-patent infringement action involving navigation
    infotainment system technology. Obtained a settlement without trial.
    Representation of an international pet technology startup in the defense of a patent infringement action involving remote pet communication devices. Obtained summary judgment of non-infringement.
    Representation of a traffic management technology company in a patent infringement
    deceptive advertising action involving portable traffic systems at construction sites. Obtained dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff's claims
    award of attorneys' fees for plaintiff's litigation misconduct.
    Representation of an event management technology solutions company in a copyright, trade secret,
    breach of contract action.
    Representation of a consumer electronics manufacturer in patent dispute involving battery technology.
    Representation of a consumer electronics manufacturer in investigation involving television remote controls.
    Representation of universal remote control company in numerous appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit relating to remote control technology, signaling,
    wireless communication.
    Representation of a tool manufacturer in the defense of a five-patent infringement action involving laser marking technology. Obtained a settlement without trial.
    Representation of a beverage packaging company in a patent, trade secret,
    trade dress action involving beverage delivery systems
    associated fitments. Obtained a settlement without trial.
    Representation of a medical diagnostic equipment manufacturer in the defense of a patent infringement action involving automated laboratory software.
    Representation of a multinational hospitality company in the defense of a five-patent infringement action involving point-of-sale technology.
    The above representations were h
    led by Mr. Bokar prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, P.A.
    Previous Experience: Undergraduate Research Associate, Aerospace Research Center, 2013-2014
    Manufacturing Engineer Intern, Swagelok Company, 2012
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/b/bokar-erik-m

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Florida
    Florida
    Illinois
    Illinois
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Member, Intellectual Property Owners Association
    •Member, American Intellectual Property Law Association
    •Member, Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago
    •Member, Innovate Orlando
    •Member, Indiana University Maurer School of Law Alumni Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Indiana University Maurer School of Law
    Class of 2017
    J.D.
    Executive Outreach Editor, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
    Other Education
    The Ohio State University
    Class of 2014
    B.S.
    Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, summa cum laude

Email Erik M. Bokar

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Erik M. Bokar attended Indiana University Maurer School of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions