×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo
Pro

Craig Martin

Not yet reviewed

360 North Green Street, Suite 1300, Chicago, IL 60607

Litigation

About Craig Martin

Craig Martin focuses on complex commercial disputes in state and federal courts. He supports clients through all stages of litigation, with a particular emphasis on substantive legal analysis, motion practice, appellate briefing, and contract-related disputes. Craig has significant experience briefing and litigating federal regulatory and enforcement issues, including SEC disgorgement standards, and has worked on appeals before the Fifth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits, as well as state appellate courts and the New Jersey Supreme Court. He regularly handles discovery, including drafting and responding to discovery requests and taking depositions, and is involved in settlement negotiations with opposing counsel. His practice also includes post-judgment proceedings, asset-recovery litigation, and arbitration matters.

Concentrations

•Commercial litigation
•Contractual disputes, business torts and breaches of fiduciary duty
•Appeals
•Post-judgment and asset-recovery litigation

Judicial Clerkships

•Hon. Robert L. Miller, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, 2020-2022

 

Craig Martin (Chicago, Illinois) View website

Reviews for Craig

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Representation of a former public-company CEO in a federal securities enforcement action, including drafting opening
    reply briefs
    arguing the appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in SEC v. Stack, resulting in the reversal of the district court's disgorgement order
    a holding that any disgorgement must be limited to the client's actual unjust enrichment.
    Representation of Venequip
    its affiliates in complex cross-border commercial litigation arising from loan
    dealer-relationship disputes related to Venezuela's mining crackdown, including drafting dispositive briefing
    securing dismissal with prejudice of a $10 million breach of contract claim in the district court
    drafting appellate briefing defending that judgment before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    second-chairing oral argument

    continued representation on rem
    .
    Representation of Native American tribes
    affiliated entities in litigation involving sovereign immunity
    state usury restrictions, including managing matters through negotiated settlements, drafting settlement agreements,
    effectuating dismissals under Rule 41.
    Representation of a contractor in litigation arising from an Illinois Department of Transportation highway construction project, including pursuing Rule 308 certification to address a controlling question of law regarding contractual notice
    liability, resulting in a favorable ruling
    a settlement.
    Representation of the Innocence Project in a pro bono amicus curiae matter before the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. Watson, including drafting arguments for the amicus brief that contributed to a unanimous decision resolving a matter of first impression by limiting the admissibility of first-time in-court eyewitness identifications
    strengthening due process protections in criminal trials.
    Representation of an individual in an appeal of an asylum denial before the Board of Immigration Appeals.
    Internships: Judicial Extern, Hon. Chief Justice Loretta H. Rush, Indiana Supreme Court, 2019
    Judicial Extern, Hon. Thomas M. Durkin, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 2018
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/m/martin-craig

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Illinois
    Illinois
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Sherman Minton Moot Court Competition: Oral Advocacy Honors, Fall 2019
    •Internal Mock Trial Competition
    •Champion, 2020
    •Semi-Finalist, 2019
    •AAJ External Mock Trial Team, 2020
    •ABA Employment Law External Mock Trial Team, 2019

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Indiana University Maurer School of Law
    Class of 2020
    J.D.
    cum laude; Articles Editor, Indiana Law Journal
    Other Education
    Taylor University
    Class of 2014
    B.A.

Email Craig Martin

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Craig Martin attended Indiana University Maurer School of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions