Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLPPartner

no photo

About Brian Charles Swanson

Brian Charles Swanson is a lawyer practicing corporate & incorporation, securities & investment fraud, commercial litigation. Brian received a B.A. degree from Amherst College in 1994, and has been licensed for 25 years. Brian practices at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP in Chicago, IL.

Reviews for Brian

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Other 2
    • Corporate & Incorporation
    • Securities & Investment Fraud

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    REPRESENTATIVE CASES TRIED OR OTHERWISE TAKEN TO JUDGMENT: State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Khan et. al.,: (U.S. District Court, Central District of California)
    Lead counsel for defendants in RICO action seeking over $100 million in damages arising out of alleged medical billing fraud. Won summary judgment. Case currently on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
    Angelotti Chiropractic, Inc., et. al. v. Baker: (U.S. Court, Central District of California)
    Won state-wide preliminary injunction prohibiting the enforcement of new fees imposed by the State of California on providers of medical services to workers' compensation claimants. The injunction is estimated to have saved the providers several hundred million dollars.
    California Young Republicans, Inc. v. Rodriguez, et. al.: (AAA Arbitration, Los Angeles, California)
    Lead trial counsel in AAA arbitration to resolve disputed elections of officers
    directors to one of the leading volunteer organizations affiliated with the California Republican Party. The arbitrator issued a reasoned decision in favor of our clients.
    Alexsam, Inc. v. IDT Corporation: (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas)
    Lead trial counsel for defendant IDT Corporation in two related patent infringement actions involving systems for activating pre-paid gift cards
    phone cards. Won judgment as a matter of law on some claims in the district court
    reversal of the jury's verdict of infringement on other claims on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The second case settled favorably after a bench trial but prior to the court entering judgment.
    In re Genetically Modified Rice Litigation: (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri)
    Member of national trial team for Bayer in multi-district litigation relating to the unintended low level presence of genetically engineered rice in commercial rice shipments. Thous
    s of actions are pending in six states. Served as trial counsel in a series of bellwether trials in 2009
    2010.
    Edward Keely v. Janus Management Holdings Corp.: (District Court, Denver, Colorado)
    Lead trial counsel for former Janus portfolio manager in action for fraud, breach of employment contract
    related claims against mutual fund company. Won $4.8 million jury verdict, which was later increased to over $7 million due to statutory enhancements, interest
    attorneys' fees. The jury found that Janus committed fraud,
    that finding is believed to have precipitated the ouster of Janus's CEO.
    Law Week Colorado, Former Janus Manager Awarded $4.8M
    Denver Post
    Bloomberg.com
    Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp.: ( Applied III ): (U.S. District Court, Central District of California)
    Trial counsel for defendant United States Surgical Corporation, a subsidiary of Covidien, in patent infringement suit. Applied Medical alleged that U.S. Surgical infringed a medical device patent
    sought up to $300 million in damages plus an injunction. Won non-infringement jury verdict after five-week trial. Prior to Bartlit Beck's representation, U.S. Surgical had twice previously been found to willfully infringe the same patent. The judgment was subsequently affirmed on appeal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
    Morgan Stanley Research Report
    IPLaw360, Tyco Unit Wins Jury Verdict In Patent Dispute
    IPLaw360, Judge Junks Applied's Appeal Of Covidien Verdict
    Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp.: ( Applied II ): (U.S. District Court, Central District of California)
    Lead trial counsel for defendant United States Surgical Corporation, a subsidiary of Covidien, in connection with a trial on damages
    willfulness after patent infringement had already been established prior to Bartlit Beck's involvement.
    C&W Fabricators, Inc. v. Meriwether Capital Corp.: (AAA arbitration, New York)
    Lead trial counsel for buyers of company that manufactures intake
    exhaust systems for gas turbine power plants in arbitration against the sellers for indemnification for warranty obligations. Case won after one-week arbitration.
    Gore v. Bush: (Circuit Court, Leon County, Florida)
    Member of President George W. Bush's Florida election recount trial team. Represented President Bush in election contest filed by former Vice President Al Gore contesting the results of the 2000 Presidential election in Florida,
    in separate case seeking recognition of disqualified overseas military ballots.
    Denver Lawyers Bolster Bush's Case
    Nystrom v. Nieslanik: (District Court, Garfield County, Colorado)
    Lead trial counsel for defendant Carbondale Corporation in action by real estate developers seeking establishment of public right-of-way across client's ranch near Aspen, Colorado. Complete defense verdict won after 7-day bench trial.
    Sosa v. Glikshtern: (Superior Court, San Francisco, California)
    Lead trial counsel for defendant in civil rights action alleging discrimination
    other civil rights violations against Latinos. Complete defense verdict won after 2-week jury trial.
    William I. Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.: (U.S. District Court, Kansas)
    Member of trial team that represented plaintiff William I. Koch in 3-month jury trial involving billion-dollar securities fraud claim.
    United Technologies Corp. v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp.: (U.S. District Court, Delaware)
    Member of trial team that represented United Technologies Corp. (Pratt & Whitney Division) in 3-week bench trial involving the interpretation of a licensing agreement relating to jet engine technology.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2001, Illinois
    Memberships

    PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

    Adjunct Professor, Northwestern University School of Law, High Tech Trial Techniques

    Chicago Run, Board Member

    Common Ground Foundation, Board Member (2014-16)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Northwestern University School of Law
    Class of 2001
    J.D.
    cum laude

    Northwestern University School of Law
    Class of 2001
    J.D.
    2001 Order of the Coif

    Northwestern University School of Law
    Class of 2001
    J.D.
    Associate Editor

    Northwestern University School of Law
    Class of 2001
    J.D.
    Northwestern University Law Review

    Northwestern University School of Law
    Class of 2001
    J.D.
    Arlyn Miner Book Award
    Other Education
    Amherst College
    Class of 1994
    B.A.
    cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1971
    Merced, California, December 26, 1971

Brian Charles Swanson

Partner at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP
Not yet reviewed

Courthouse Place, 54 West Hubbard StreetChicago, IL 60654U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Glenn L. Udell
Pro
Glenn L. Udell
5.0
Corporate Law lawyer

Free Consultation

Alan B. Patzik
Pro
Alan B. Patzik
5.0
Corporate Law lawyer
Cary R. Latimer
Pro
Cary R. Latimer
5.0
Corporate Law lawyer
Michael Wise
Pro
Michael Wise
5.0
Corporate Law lawyer

Free Consultation

Jonathan E. Strouse
Pro
Jonathan E. Strouse
5.0
Corporate Law lawyer

Free Consultation

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: