×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
William Henry Pickering

William Henry Pickering

Not yet reviewed

605 Chestnut Street, Chattanooga, TN 37450

Antitrust, Automotive, Class Actions and 13 more

About William Henry Pickering

William Henry Pickering is a lawyer practicing antitrust, automotive, class actions and 13 other areas of law. William received a B.A. degree from University of the South in 1973, and has been licensed for 50 years. William practices at Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C. in Chattanooga, TN.

William Henry Pickering (Chattanooga, Tennessee)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

William Henry Pickering got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for William

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 1
    • Antitrust
  • Class Actions
  • Education Law 1
    • Education
  • Labor and Employment 1
    • Labor & Employment Law
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Litigation - Commercial
  • Administrative Law 1
    • Litigation and Administrative Actions
  • Insurance 1
    • Litigation and Risk Management
  • Municipal Law 2
    • Municipal Litigation and Representation
    • Municipal and Government
  • Appellate Practice 1
    • Appeals
  • Agency and Distributorships 1
    • Trade Regulation and Product Distribution
  • Transportation 1
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Other 4
    • Automotive
    • Compliance Counseling and Training
    • Food and Beverage
    • Manufacturing

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Successful defense of Tennessee health care provider in federal age discrimination suit
    jury verdict for defendant following four-day trial
    Successful defense of manufacturer in California class action involving alleged violations of wage
    hour laws
    Successful representation of two Tennessee employers in separate suits to enforce noncompetition
    trade secrecy agreements
    Successful defense of separate lawsuits by School System administrators alleging statutory violations
    breach of contract in connection with merger of City
    County Schools
    decisions in client's favor affirmed by Tennessee Court of Appeals in both cases
    Successful defense of Tennessee manufacturer in federal court lawsuit alleging violations of ERISA
    the Family
    Medical Leave Act
    Successful defense of Georgia personal injury action in which permanently disabled plaintiff alleged that independent contractor was client's employee
    Successful defense of Tennessee manufacturer in federal court suit alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act
    decision in client's favor affirmed by Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
    Successful defense of Mississippi suit for alleged breach of independent contractor agreement
    Successful defense of Tennessee manufacturer in federal court suit alleging race discrimination
    retaliation
    decision in client's favor affirmed by Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
    Successful defense of Arkansas federal court suit for alleged violations of Americans with Disabilities Act
    jury verdict for defendant following three-day trial

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1979, Tennessee
    1976, Alabama
    1979, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
    1980, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia
    1987, U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit
    2005, U. S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
    1976, Georgia
    1976, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama
    Memberships

    Professional

    Bar Associations

    • Chattanooga Bar Association, past President
    • Lookout Mountain Bar Association
    • Tennessee Bar Association
    • State Bar of Georgia
    • Alabama State Bar
    • American Bar Association, Sections of Labor & Employment Law and Litigation

    Bar Fellowship
    Tennessee Bar Foundation.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Vanderbilt University
    Class of 1976
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of the South
    Class of 1973
    B.A.
    magna cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1951
    Chattanooga, Tennessee, December 14, 1951

Email William Henry Pickering

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions