×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Richard W Bethea, Jr

Richard W Bethea, Jr

Not yet reviewed

605 Chestnut Street, Chattanooga, TN 37450

Automotive, Business Law, Class Actions and 16 more

About Richard W Bethea, Jr

Richard W Bethea, Jr is a lawyer practicing automotive, business law, class actions and 16 other areas of law. Richard received a B.A. degree from University of Georgia in 1975, and has been licensed for 48 years. Richard practices at Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C. in Chattanooga, TN.

Richard W Bethea, Jr (Chattanooga, Tennessee)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Richard W Bethea, Jr got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Richard

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law
  • Class Actions
  • Energy 1
    • Energy and Telecommunication Utilities
  • Health Care
  • Insurance 2
    • Insurance Defense
    • Litigation and Risk Management
  • Intellectual Property 3
    • Intellectual Property Law
    • Media and Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patents
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Litigation - Commercial
  • Civil Practice 1
    • Litigation - General Civil Practice
  • Nonprofit and Charitable Organizations 1
    • Nonprofit Organizations
  • Products Liability 1
    • Product Liability Law
  • Professional Liability 1
    • Product and Professional Liability Defense
  • Torts 1
    • Tort & Personal Injury
  • Transportation 1
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Other 3
    • Automotive
    • Food and Beverage
    • Manufacturing

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Retired
    Firm Name
    Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: A defense verdict in favor of our client, a manufacturer accused of trade secret misappropriation by a competitor (Jury-Federal Court)
    A defense verdict in favor of our client, a manufacturer accused of patent infringement by a competitor (Jury-Federal Court)
    A defense verdict in favor of our client, a fast food multiple franchise, sued for millions in damages
    specific performance regarding proposed sale of fast food restaurants (Jury-Federal Court)
    Arbitration Award in favor of our client, a manufacturer sued by an independent dealer for more than $15 million for alleged breach of the dealer agreement
    A settlement award for a client in patent infringement litigation resulting in a permanent injunction
    cash payments of past due royalties in a matter of months after suit was filed
    A few representative clients: Astec Industries, Inc.
    domestic
    international subsidiaries
    Coker Tire Company
    Covenant Transportation Group, Inc.
    Life Care Centers of America
    United States Stove Company
    United States Vinyl Corporation

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1978, Georgia
    1978, Tennessee
    2008, U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan
    2007, U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee
    2003, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee
    1996, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    1996, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    1994, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    1992, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
    1991, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
    1990, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
    1982, U.S. Supreme Court
    1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
    1978, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia
    Memberships

    Professional

    • Defense Research Institute, Product Liability Committee, Manufacturer's Risk Prevention Litigation Group, Agricultural, Construction, Mining and Industrial Equipment Specialized Litigation Group
    • Product Liability Advisory Council, Designated Corporate Representative and former Board Member
    • American Inns of Court, Brock-Cooper Chapter
    • American Intellectual Property Law Association
    • Diversity Law Institute, Member
    • The Trial Law Institute, Member
    • International Association of Defense Counsel
    • NITA Advocates Association
    • Tennessee Defense Lawyers Association

    Bar Associations

    • Tennessee Bar Association, Business Law Section, Intellectual Property Section, Litigation Section, Tort and Insurance Law Section
    • American Bar Association, Litigation Section, Tort & Insurance Practice Section, Intellectual Property Section
    • Chattanooga Bar Association
    • Lookout Mountain Bar Association
    • State Bar of Georgia
    • Federal Bar Association
    • Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit

    Pro Bono

    • Tennessee Supreme Court Recognition for Pro Bono Service
    • Religious nonprofit organizations and exempt organizations legal work including intellectual property, fundraising, and corporate records

    Bar Fellowship
    Litigation Counsel of America.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Georgia School of Law
    Class of 1978
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Georgia
    Class of 1975
    B.A.
    Business Administration
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1952
    Chattanooga, Tennessee, November 17, 1952

Email Richard W Bethea, Jr

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions