×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.Share Holder
Mr. John Gerard Jackson

Mr. John Gerard Jackson

5.0
1 review

605 Chestnut Street, Chattanooga, TN 37450

Litigation - Commercial, Litigation - General Civil Practice, Creditors Practice and 6 more

About Mr. John Gerard Jackson

Mr. John Gerard Jackson is a lawyer practicing litigation - commercial, litigation - general civil practice, creditors practice and 6 other areas of law. John received a B.S. degree from University of Tennessee, Chattanooga in 1985, and has been licensed for 37 years. John practices at Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C. in Chattanooga, TN.

Mr. John Gerard Jackson (Chattanooga, Tennessee)

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Mr. John Gerard Jackson got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for John

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
1
5.0
Lawyers.com
1
4.5
Martindale
7
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Personal Injury
Posted by anonymous
February 21, 2014
Hired Attorney

When we where advised to consult a attorney we gave Mr Jackson a call, he was recommended by a friend of the family at OLPH, we called left a message and he returned the call that afternoon, he gave us the time needed to explain everything we needed to know. The time he gave was like we where his only clint which made us fell secure in our choice in calling him, and we thank him for that.....

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Patents
  • Other 7
    • Litigation - Commercial
    • Litigation - General Civil Practice
    • Creditors Practice
    • Trademarks, Service Marks, and Trade Names
    • Litigation and Risk Management
    • Media and Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Product and Professional Liability Defense

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Obtained temporary restraining order
    favorable settlement against individuals
    companies arising from trade secret
    non-compete issues
    Successfully dissolved injunction entered against company relating to alleged theft of trade secrets
    Obtained injunctive relief
    favorable settlement for manufacturer of specialty carpet against competitor in trademark infringement case
    Proactively advised clients on avoiding litigation of dealer distributor general business disputes
    intellectual property disputes
    Successfully settled patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of patent owner relating to heavy machinery
    www.uscourts.gov/cameras-courts/multilayer-stretch-cling-film-holdings-inc-v-inteplast-group-ltd-
    -amtopp-corp
    John Jackson is a Rule 31 General Civil Mediator.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1989, Tennessee
    1990, US District Court Eastern District of Tennessee
    1991, Georgia
    1992, US District Court Northern District of Georgia
    1996, US Court of Appeals 6th Circuit
    2000, US District Court Middle District of Tennessee
    2004, US Court of Appeals 11th Circuit
    2006, US Court of Appeals Federal Circuit
    2011, US District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin
    2012, US District Court Western District of Tennessee
    Memberships

    Professional

    • Rule 31 General Civil Mediator
    • American Inns of the Court, Brock-Cooper Chapter
    • American Intellectual Property Law Association
    • Chattanooga Technology Council
    • Defense Research Institute
    • Hamilton County Juvenile Court, Volunteer Attorney

    Bar Associations

    • Chattanooga Bar Association
    • Lookout Mountain Bar Association
    • Tennessee Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section
    • State Bar of Georgia
    • American Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section
    • Federal Bar Association

    Pro Bono Work

    • Legal Aid of East Tennessee
    Volunteer Attorney, guardian ad litem, Juvenile Court

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Cincinnati
    Class of 1989
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Tennessee, Chattanooga
    Class of 1985
    B.S.
    magna cum laude

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1962
    Chattanooga, Tennessee, September 24, 1962

Mr. John Gerard Jackson

Share Holder at Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.
5.0
1 review

Liberty Tower Suite 1700605 Chestnut StreetChattanooga, TN 37450U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

William Ray Hannah
Pro
William Ray Hannah
4.8
23
Commercial Litigation lawyer
888-257-5161
View Profile
McKinley Snipes Lundy, Jr.
Pro
McKinley Snipes Lundy, Jr.
4.2
1
Commercial Litigation lawyer
CallView Phone
View Profile
Jeremy Matthew Cothern
Pro
Jeremy Matthew Cothern
4.9
16
Commercial Litigation lawyer
CallView Phone
View Profile
Robert Jonathan Guthrie
Pro
Robert Jonathan Guthrie
4.6
18
Commercial Litigation lawyer
CallView Phone
View Profile
Jerry D. Kizer, Jr.
Pro
Jerry D. Kizer, Jr.
5.0
1
Commercial Litigation lawyer
731-300-9815
View Profile

Email Mr. John Gerard Jackson

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions