×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Daniel H. Coles

Daniel H. Coles

Not yet reviewed

2900-595 Burrard Street, P.O. Box 49130, Vancouver, BC V7X 1J5

Administrative Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Construction Disputes and 7 more

About Daniel H. Coles

Daniel H. Coles is a lawyer practicing administrative law, alternative dispute resolution, construction disputes and 7 other areas of law. Daniel H. received a B.A. degree from St. Francis Xavier University in 2008, and has been licensed for 14 years. Daniel H. practices at Owen Bird Law Corporation in Vancouver, BC.

Daniel H. Coles (Vancouver, British Columbia)

Reviews for Daniel H.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Litigation
  • Other 7
    • Construction Disputes
    • Defamation & Publication Management
    • Food & Beverage
    • Insolvency & Restructuring
    • Insurance (Litigation)
    • Media & Communications
    • Yukon Law

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Owen Bird Law Corporation
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    REPRESENTATIVE WORK: Construction Litigation: Berlan Construction Inc. v Onni Development (Ioco Road) Corporation, 2018 BCSC 1228Obtained a $550,000 judgment for a developer against a trade on account of delayed
    deficient work.Iberdrola Energy Projects Canada Corporation v. Factory Sales & Engineering Inc. d.b.a. FSE Energy, 2018 BCCA 272Successfully opposed an appeal relating to the proper calculation of holdback monies under the Builders Lien Act where the general contractor attempted to characterize certain payments as loans . Media & Defamation Litigation: Canada (National Inquiry into Missing
    Murdered Indigenous Women
    Girls) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 741Successfully opposed the Attorney General of Canada's request to have portions of hearing held in camera.Galloway v A.B, 2019 BCSC 1417In what was the first court application made under the new Protection of Public Participation Act, successfully obtained an order for the plaintiff in a defamation action that required the parties who were previously cross-examined on their affidavits to provide additional documents
    information.Postmedia Network Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2019 BCPC 267Successfully varied certain sealing orders over RCMP production orders
    ITOs related to the Victoria legislature spending sc
    al.United States v Meng, 2020 BCSC 43Acted (unsuccessfully) on behalf of a consortium of national
    international news agencies to record
    broadcast the extradition hearing of Ms. Meng.R. v Arfmann, 2020 BCSC 56On behalf of a consortium of news agencies, obtained access to a video recording
    police radio transcript exhibited in a first degree murder trial. Estate Litigation: Sutherl
    v. Collett (Estate), 2017 YKSC 36On behalf of a widow, obtained an order entitling her to the proceeds of her late husb
    's RRSP.
    Injunctions
    Vancouver Fraser Port Authority v Doe, 2020 BCSC 244 Obtained an injunction for the Port of Vancouver against individuals blockading access to Port l
    s. Vancouver Fraser Port Authority v Brett, 2020 BCSC 876 Obtained an injunction for the Port of Vancouver enjoining unlawful trespass
    occupation of federal l
    s.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2012, British Columbia
    2019, Yukon Territory
    Memberships

    Professional Membership

    Member, Canadian Media Lawyers Association/AdIDEM

    Former Board Member, Vancouver Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Dalhousie Univeristy
    Class of 2011
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    St. Francis Xavier University
    Class of 2008
    B.A.
    with Hons

Daniel H. Coles

Share Holder at Owen Bird Law Corporation
Not yet reviewed

Three Bentall Centre, 2900-595 Burrard StreetP.O. Box 49130Vancouver, BC V7X 1J5Canada

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Randall J. Kaardal, K.C., K.C.
Pro
Randall J. Kaardal, K.C., K.C.
4.4
1
Administrative Law lawyer
857-491-4612
View Profile
Claire E. Hunter , K.C., K.C.
Pro
Claire E. Hunter , K.C., K.C.
4.5
3
Administrative Law lawyer
857-491-4612
View Profile
Chilwin C. Cheng
Pro
Chilwin C. Cheng
4.8
34
Administrative Law lawyer

Free Consultation

CallView Phone
View Profile
William B. Smart, K.C., K.C.
Pro
William B. Smart, K.C., K.C.
5.0
1
Administrative Law lawyer
857-491-4612
View Profile
Robert J. McDonell
Pro
Robert J. McDonell
4.4
1
Administrative Law lawyer
CallView Phone
View Profile

Email Daniel H. Coles

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions