Crawley MacKewn Brush LLPPartner

Linda L. Fuerst

About Linda L. Fuerst

Linda L. Fuerst is a lawyer practicing class actions, commercial litigation, securities litigation. Linda L. has been licensed for 43 years. Linda L. practices at Crawley MacKewn Brush LLP in Toronto, ON.

Awards

Reviews for Linda L.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Class Actions
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Other 1
    • Securities Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Crawley MacKewn Brush LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Cases: Re Ernst & Young LLP (Sino-Forest
    Zungui Haixi) Counsel to the respondent auditor in two proceedings brought by the Ontario Securities Commission under the Securities Act resulting in the first no contest settlement under OSC Staff Notice 15-702: Revised Credit for Cooperation Program. In the Matter of Universal Market Integrity Rules
    In the Matter of Marc McQuillen Counsel to the Applicant before the Ontario Securities Commission in a successful application to set aside a settlement agreement entered into by the Applicant with Market Regulation Services (now IIROC). The approval of the settlement was based upon breaches of Universal Market Integrity Rules, which, in a subsequent IIROC hearing against another respondent were found not to have occurred. The Ontario Securities Commission held that it would be manifestly unfair in the circumstances to allow the settlement agreement
    settlement approval to st
    . Calvin Wadden et al v. BMO Nesbitt Burns Successful defence of the defendant brokerage firm at a lengthy trial before the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in an action for negligence
    breach of contract arising out of the alleged manipulation of shares of Knowledge House Inc. Sino-Forest Corporation (Re) Counsel for the defendant auditors of Sino-Forest Corporation in connection with a shareholder class action claiming damages in order of $9 billion on behalf of primary
    secondary market purchasers
    debt-holders. Successfully resolved proceeding
    coordinated precedent setting settlement approval of a Canadian class action within the context of an ongoing CCAA proceeding. Counsel in appeals from settlement approval to the Court of Appeal
    Supreme Court of Canada, both of which were dismissed. In re Berry Successful representation of respondent dismissing all charges brought against him under the Uniform Market Integrity Rules by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC). In re Berry Successful appeal to the Ontario Securities Commission from decision of IIROC refusing Berry's request for production of documents covered by settlement privilege. In re Magna Counsel to an opposing shareholder on the application
    the appeal opposing the approval of Magna's plan of arrangement under the OBCA. Tucci v. Smart Technologies Inc. et al. Representation of two defendants in a securities class action alleging prospectus misrepresentation by the issuer, selling shareholders
    others. Class definition under section 130 of the Securities Act successfully restricted to purchasers under the prospectus
    not secondary market purchasers during the period of distribution. CC&L Dedicated Enterprise Fund (Trustee of) v. Fisherman Counsel to a law firm
    one of its partners in shareholder class proceedings alleging fraud
    misrepresentation in a prospectus
    financial statements,
    defence of related Ontario Securities Commission proceeding. Dugal v. Manulife Financial Corporation et al. Counsel to one of the defendants in a class proceeding alleging misrepresentations in secondary market disclosure documents
    prospectuses. Both common law
    statutory cause of action are asserted. Successful motion to bar assertion of statutory cause of action for prospectus misrepresentation due to expiry of the limitation period. Dugal v. Manulife Financial Corporation et al. Successful representation of one of the defendants in a class proceeding on a motion for leave to appeal the motion judge's ruling that the defendants are not required to deliver affidavits or to be subjected to cross-examination when they do not intend to lead evidence in response to a motion to commence a proceeding under Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act. Riediger v. Air Canada Counsel to one of the defendants in an ongoing class proceeding alleging conspiracy to fix passenger fares, including breach of the Competition Act. Zaniewicz
    Clarke v. Zungui Haixi Corporation Counsel for one of the defendants in a shareholder class action alleging that the defendant company's public offering prospectus
    other disclosure documents contained untrue representations on a motion for an order certifying the action as a class proceeding for settlement purposes.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1983, Ontario
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Osgoode Hall Law School
    Class of 1981
    LL.B.
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: