×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Mr. Alexey V. Manasuev

Not yet reviewed

155 University Avenue, Suite 1230, Toronto, ON M5H 3B7

Corporate Law, Mergers and Acquisitions, Taxation and 19 more

About Mr. Alexey V. Manasuev

Mr. Alexey V. Manasuev is a lawyer practicing corporate law, mergers and acquisitions, taxation and 19 other areas of law. Alexey received a degree from Institute of European Law in 1999, and has been licensed for 23 years. Alexey practices in Toronto, ON.

Reviews for Alexey

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Corporate Law
  • Taxation 2
    • Tax Audits
    • Tax Planning
  • Other 18
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Federal Estate and Gift Taxation
    • Federal Income Tax
    • Federal Tax Controversies
    • Federal Taxation
    • Individual Taxation
    • International Income Tax
    • International Tax Controversies
    • International Taxation
    • Sales and Use Tax
    • State Income Tax
    • State Tax Controversies
    • State Taxation
    • Tax Appeals
    • Tax Controversies
    • Tax Law
    • Taxation of Foreign Nationals
    • Trusts and Estates Taxation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
    German
    Spanish
    Russian

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2003, New York
    2009, District of Columbia
    2003, U.S. Tax Court
    Bar Fellowship
    American Bar Association, Section of Taxation, 2009-2010; Global Hauser Scholarship, NYU, 2001-2002; King's College, University of London, Postgraduate Scholarship, 2000; Editor, NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, 2001-2002. Selected Articles: Co-Author, Rhoades and Manasuev on Demystifying FBAR, Emerging Issues Analysis (Jun. 2013), LexisNexis, ISBN: 9781422429983; Co-Author, Rhoades and Manasuev on Practical Tax Considerations for Sovereign Wealth Fund Investments in the United States, Emerging Issues Analysis (Dec. 29, 2011), LexisNexis, ISBN: 9781422429983; Author, Overview of 2010 U.S. Transfer Pricing Developments, 5 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 6 (Jul. 2011); Co-Author, The New US Statutory Economic Substance Doctrine: They Forgot the Important Parts—Has Everything or Nothing Changed?, Report of Proceedings of the Sixty-Second Tax Conference, 2010 Conference Report (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 2011), 18:1-42; Co-Author, Liquidity, Certainty, and Rollover Loans: Notice 2008-91 and Relief From IRC Section 956, 57 TAX NOTES INT'L 793 (Mar. 1, 2010); Author, Long Delayed Italy-U.S. Income Tax Treaty Goes into Effect: Little Time for Companies to Take Important Actions, 13 PRACTICAL US/INTERNATIONAL TAX STRATEGIES 20, at 4, Dec. 2009 (also reprinted in 11 PRACTICAL EUROPEAN TAX STRATEGIES 12, at 2, Dec. 2009); Co-Author (originated series of articles), Eligibility for Treaty Benefits Under the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Treaty, 54 TAX NOTES INT'L 967 (May 26, 2009); Co-Author, Managing Transfer Pricing Risk, 9 BNAI TAX PLANNING INT'L TRANSFER PRICING 0905 d2 (May 22, 2009). Speaker: Practical Considerations of Dealing with the Pricing of Guarantee Arrangements, Panelist at the 2012 American Bar Association Section of Taxation Joint Fall Meeting (Boston, September 2012); Upcoming US Tax Reform and Comparison of US and Canadian Tax Systems, Networking Seminars (Toronto, September 2012). Member: New York State Bar Association, Tax Law Section; American Bar Association, Section of Taxation. Fellow: John S. Nolan Fellow, American Bar Association, Section of Taxation, 2009-2010.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    New York University School of Law
    Class of 2002
    LL.M.
    in International Taxation
    Other Education
    Institute of European Law
    Class of 1999
    Master of Jurisprudence

    Institute of European Law
    Class of 1999
    with honors

    Moscow State Institute for International Relations
    Class of 1997
    Law Faculty with honors

Email Mr. Alexey V. Manasuev

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions