×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Richard A. Friedman

Richard A. Friedman

Not yet reviewed

1255 Robert-Bourassa, Suite 1500, Montreal, QC H3B 3X2

Commercial Lease, Shareholder Agreements, Sale Agreements and 10 more

About Richard A. Friedman

Richard A. Friedman is a lawyer practicing commercial lease, shareholder agreements, sale agreements and 10 other areas of law. Richard A. received a B.A. degree from McGill University in 1986, and has been licensed for 35 years. Richard A. practices at Richard A. Friedman in Montreal, QC.

Richard A. Friedman (Montreal, Quebec)

Reviews for Richard A.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Leases and Leasing 2
    • Commercial Lease
    • Landlord and Tenant Law
  • Securities 2
    • Shareholder Agreements
    • Securities Law
  • Agency and Distributorships 1
    • Distribution
  • Business Law 1
    • Franchise
  • Real Estate
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Labor and Employment 1
    • Labour Law
  • Other 4
    • Sale Agreements
    • License
    • Civil Responsibility
    • Professional Responsibility

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
    French
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Richard A. Friedman
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    3420728 Canada inc. c. 9032-0805 Québec inc., 15 Avril 2004 (C.A.)
    9053-3993 Québec inc. v. Drazin, 19 Juillet 2007 (C.S.)
    Raschella c. Brodeur, és qualités, 5 Décembre 2006 (C.S.)
    Emballages Crown Packaging Inc. c. Groupe Dynamite inc., 1 Décembre 2005 (C.Q.)
    Canadian Sporting Goods Association of Canada Inc. v. Karabetian, 10 Décembre 2004 (C.S.)
    Harris c. Ostromogilski, 4 février 1998 (C.S.)
    Réservances.ca inc. c. Rollan Energie inc. (Roll
    Virtual Business Systems Ltd.), 24 Juin 2007 (C.S.)
    2020 University Associates, société en comm
    ite c. Riouchi, 23 Décembre 2008 (C.S.)
    Rosenzveig v. Altro, 12 Novembre 1999 (C.S.)
    Bu
    erie Blanchelle inc. c. Québec (Agence de la santé et des services sociauz de Montréal), 6 Novembre 2008 (C.S.)
    Banque de Montréal c. Jean Duquette, 11 Mai 1999 (C.S.)
    Raschella c. Brodeur, 23 février 2006 (C.S.)
    Adam Karpinski c. Pierre Sylvestre et Sylvestre, Charbonneau, Fafard, 13 mai 2009 (C.S.)
    EYB 2009-159440
    AZ-50557466
    J.E. 2009-1138.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1991, Quebec
    Memberships
    Quebec Bar Association.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Université Le Sherbrooke
    Class of 1990
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    McGill University
    Class of 1986
    B.A.
    Economics

Richard A. Friedman

Partner at Richard A. Friedman
Not yet reviewed

1255 Robert-Bourassa, Suite 1500Montreal, QC H3B 3X2Canada

Email Richard A. Friedman

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions