×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Bereskin & Parr S.E.N.C.R.l., s.r.l.Partner
François Larose

François Larose

Not yet reviewed

600, boulevard De Maisonneuve Ouest, Montreal, QC H3A 3J2

Trademarks, Licensing & Transactions and New Media/Copyright

About François Larose

François Larose is a lawyer practicing trademarks, licensing & transactions, new media/copyright. François received a degree from Universite du Quebec en Outaouais in 1995, and has been licensed for 24 years. François practices at Bereskin & Parr S.E.N.C.R.l., s.r.l. in Montreal, QC.

François Larose (Montreal, Quebec)

Reviews for François

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Trademarks
  • Other 2
    • Licensing & Transactions
    • New Media/Copyright

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Bereskin & Parr S.E.N.C.R.l., s.r.l.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2002, Québec
    Registered Canadian Trademark Agent, 2006
    Bar Fellowship

    Licensing Executives Society (LES)

    Litigation Cases

    Arnold Palmer Enterprises, Inc. v. 9015-6803 Quebec Inc. (One World Golf) et al.
    Representing Arnold Palmer Enterprises in enforcement proceedings relating to ARNOLD PALMER intellectual properties.
    Counsel: Robert Storey and François Larose
    (2012), (T-713-12)

    Interactive Life Forms, LLC et al. v. Various
    Represented Interactive Life Forms in actions for trademark infringement, passing off, and copyright infringement. The actions were brought against Canadian companies alleged to have sold counterfeit versions of Interactive Life Forms' FLESHLIGHT products.
    Counsel: Adam Bobker, Robert Storey, and François Larose
    (2012)

    Laboratoires Quinton Internationale S.L. v. Biss
    Acting for Laboratoires Quinton, a European manufacturer of QUINTON therapeutic marine plasma, in a French language action to expunge a Canadian trademark registration for QUINTON held by a former Canadian distributor of QUINTON products. The trial of this action is scheduled for December 2013.
    Counsel: Adam Bobker, Brigitte Chan and François Larose
    (Reported decisions: 2010 FC 358)
    (2006), (T-1554-06)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    McGill University
    Class of 2002
    LL.M.

    Universite d'Ottawa
    Class of 1999
    LL.L.
    Other Education
    Universite du Quebec en Outaouais
    Class of 1995
    B.A.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1970
    1970

Email François Larose

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions