×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Woods LLPAttorney
Alexandre Baril-Furino

Alexandre Baril-Furino

Not yet reviewed

Suite 1700, Montreal, QC H3A 3H3

About Alexandre Baril-Furino

Alexandre Baril-Furino is a lawyer. Alexandre received a degree from University of Ottawa Faculty of Law, Common Law Section in 2012, and has been licensed for 12 years. Alexandre practices at Woods LLP in Montreal, QC.

Alexandre Baril-Furino (Montreal, Quebec)

Reviews for Alexandre

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Practice Details

  • Languages
    French
    English
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Woods LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    REPRESENTATIVE MANDATES: Acted for McCarthy Tetrault, successfully defending a Motion in disqualification brought forth in a litigation matter where McCarthy Tetrault represented Hydro-Quebec.
    Member of the team formed by the firm for the representation of Chrysler Canada Inc. in the major professional liability suit against Coopers & Lybr
    , in the context of the Castor Holdings saga.
    Acted for Videotron s.e.n.c., successfully defending a Motion for a provisional interlocutory injunction presented by Bell Canada in order to force Videotron to cease the diffusion of publicities that were namely aired during the 2015 National Hockey League playoffs.
    Represents the Syndicat des coproprietaires de VUE Phases I et II in two proceedings instituted against the developer
    Group Canvar Inc. for latent defects, faulty design
    construction defects.
    Represents the Syndicat Condos Reve in a proceeding instituted against the developer
    various professionals aRepresents the Syndicat des coproprietaires Le Riviera in a proceeding instituted against the developer
    various professionals
    sub-trades, as well as their officers
    directors, for latent defects, faulty design
    construction defects,
    damages
    Represents the Syndicat des coproprietaires Lowney 10 in a proceeding instituted by a co-owner against the developer
    the Syndicate for latent defects, faulty design
    construction defects
    Represents syndicates of co-ownership for various strategic files
    questions related to litigation
    /or management of the co-ownership
    Represents co-owners in various files
    disputes involving the syndicate of co-ownership, the developer
    other parties, as well as other co-owners
    nd sub-trades for latent defects, faulty design
    construction defects.
    Construction G.M.R. inc. v Michon, 2017 QCCS 5081 : Acted in this matter
    succeeded in obtaining the dismissal of an action in warranty launched against our firm's clients, Developpement Rescom et its administrator, real estate developers,
    of the principal action.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2014, Quebec
    Memberships

    PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND ASSOCIATIONS

    PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

    2011-2012 Garda Security Group Inc. - Montreal, Quebec
    Student-at-law (2011) and Consultant for special projects (2011-2012)

    2011 Privy Council Office - Ottawa, Ontario
    Articling student under the supervision of Mtre. Yan Campagnolo

    2010 Department of National Defence - Ottawa, Ontario
    Articling student under the supervision of Mtre. Jean Rheaume

    ASSOCIATIONS

    Quebec Bar
    Young Bar Association of Montreal
    Canadian Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Ottawa Faculty of Law, Civil Law Section
    Class of 2011
    LL.L.
    Licence in Civil Law
    Other Education
    University of Ottawa Faculty of Law, Common Law Section
    Class of 2012
    Juris Doctor

Alexandre Baril-Furino

Attorney at Woods LLP
Not yet reviewed

2000 McGill College AvenueSuite 1700Montreal, QC H3A 3H3Canada

Email Alexandre Baril-Furino

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions