×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Field LawCounsel
P. Jonathan Faulds, KC

P. Jonathan Faulds, KC

Not yet reviewed

2500 - 10175 101 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T5J 0H3

Aboriginal, Class Actions, Constitutional and 5 more

About P. Jonathan Faulds, KC

P. Jonathan Faulds, KC is a lawyer practicing aboriginal, class actions, constitutional and 5 other areas of law. P. Jonathan received a degree from University of Alberta in 1978, and has been licensed for 46 years. P. Jonathan practices at Field Law in Edmonton, AB.

P. Jonathan Faulds, KC (Edmonton, Alberta)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

P. Jonathan Faulds, KC got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for P. Jonathan

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Class Actions
  • Litigation
  • Other 6
    • Aboriginal
    • Constitutional
    • Hospital / Medical Staff Relations
    • Indigenous
    • Media + Entertainment
    • Workplace Human Rights

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Counsel
    Firm Name
    Field Law
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Reported Cases: Al-Ghamdi v. Her Majesty the Queen 2017 ABQB 169 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2017
    Jane Doe v. Alberta (Deputy Minister of Executive Council) 2016 ABQB 135 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2016
    Modry v. Alberta Health Services 2015 ABCA 328 Alberta Court of Appeal 2015
    Modry v. Alberta Health Services 2015 ABCA 265 Alberta Court of Appeal 2015
    Stout v Track 2015 ABCA 10 Alberta Court of Appeal 2015
    Trang v Alberta 2014 ABCA 382 Alberta Court of Appeal 2014
    Doe v. Alberta 2014 ABCA 246 Alberta Court of Appeal 2014
    Trang v Canada (Attorney General) 2014 ABQB 110 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2014
    Stout v Track 2013 ABQB 751 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v Alberta 2013 ABQB 649 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Buelow v. Morrissey 2013 ABQB 277 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v. Alberta Health Services 2012 ABCA 355 Alberta Court of Appeal 2012
    Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v Alberta 2011 ABQB 801 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2011
    Bruce Estate v. Toderovich 2010 ABQB 709 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2010
    Bruce Estate 2010 ABQB 21 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2010
    Sawridge v. Canada 2009 FCA 123 Federal Court of Appeal 2009
    Trang v. Alberta (Edmonton Rem
    Centre) 2007 ABCA 267 Alberta Court of Appeal 2007
    Trang v. Alberta (Edmonton Rem
    Centre) 2007 ABCA 263 Alberta Court of Appeal 2007
    Baxter et al. v. The Attorney General of Canada [Indexed as: Baxter v. Canada (Attorney General) 83 O.R. (3d) 481 Ontarion Supreme Court Justice 2006
    Sparvier v. Canada (Attorney General) 2006 S.J. No. 752 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2006
    Northwest v. Canada (Attorney General) 2006 ABQB 902 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2006
    Currie v. Alberta (Edmonton Rem
    Centre) 2006 A.J. No. 1522 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2006
    Geary v. Alberta (Edmonton Rem
    Centre) 2004 ABQB 23 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2004
    Munoz v. Alberta (Edmonton Rem
    Centre) 2004 A.J. No. 1344 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2004
    Sawridge Indian B
    v. Canada 2004 2 CNLR 316 Federal Court of Appeal 2004
    Trang v. Alberta (Director of the Edmonton Rem
    Centre) 2001 A.J. No. 1360 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2001
    Sawridge Indian B
    v. Canada 1997 F.C.J. No. 761 Federal Court of Appeal 1997
    Sawridge Indian B
    v. Canada (C.A.) 1997 3 F.C. 580 Federal Court of Appeal 1997
    Gadwa v. Kehewin Cree Nation 1996 F.C.J. No. 315 Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division 1996
    Muir v. Alberta 1996 132 DLR (4th) 695 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 1996
    Sawridge Indian B
    v. Canada (T.D.) 1996 1 F.C. 3 Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division 1995
    Reference re Electoral Division's Statutes 1995 24 Alta L R (3rd) 1 Alberta Court of Appeal 1995
    Lac la Biche (Town) v. Alberta (S.C.C.) 1994 S.C.C.A. No. 500 Supreme Court of Canada 1994
    re Electoral Boundaries Commission Act (Alberta) 86 D.L.R. (4th) 447 Alberta Court of Appral 1991
    Reference re Prov. Electoral Boundaries (Sask.) [1991] 2 SCR 158, 1991 CanLII 61 (SCC) Supreme Court of Canada 1991

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1980, Alberta
    2022, British Columbia
    Memberships

    Professional Associations

    Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Constitutional and Civil Liberties Law Section (North) Co-Chair 2009-Present

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Osgoode Hall Law School
    Class of 2012
    LL.M.
    Master of Laws

    Osgoode Hall Law School
    Class of 2012
    LL.M.
    Constitutional Law
    Other Education
    University of Alberta
    Class of 1978
    Bachelor of Laws

P. Jonathan Faulds, KC

Counsel at Field Law
Not yet reviewed

2500 - 10175 101 Street NWEdmonton, AB T5J 0H3Canada

Show on map

Email P. Jonathan Faulds, KC

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions