×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Field LawPartner
Gregory Sim

Gregory Sim

1.0
1 review

2500 - 10175 101 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T5J 0H3

Professional Regulatory, Health, Northern Canada and 5 more

About Gregory Sim

Gregory Sim is a lawyer practicing professional regulatory, health, northern canada and 5 other areas of law. Gregory received a degree from McGill University in 1999, and has been licensed for 21 years. Gregory practices at Field Law in Edmonton, AB.

Gregory Sim (Edmonton, Alberta)

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Gregory

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
1.0
See All Reviews
1
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
100%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Value for Money
1.0
Administrative Hearings and Appeals
Posted by anonymous
November 08, 2024
Hired Attorney

Worst experience dealing with this law firm ever. Originally hired a different lawyer at this law firm and after the case being dragged out far longer then needed he decided to take over without asking if I was okay with it and then lost the case! He is hugely unethical and should be avoided at all cost

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 8
    • Professional Regulatory
    • Health
    • Northern Canada
    • Labour + Employment
    • Administration
    • General Counsel for Professional Regulatory Organizations
    • Training
    • Complaints

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Field Law
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Reported Cases: MK Engineering Inc. v. Association of Professional Engineers
    Geoscientists of Alberta Appeal Board 2017 ABCA 17 Alberta Court of Appeal 2017
    M.K. Engineering Inc. v. Plecash 2015 ABCA 311 Alberta Court of Appeal 2015
    MK Engineering Inc v Plecash 2014 ABQB 483 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2014
    MK Engineering Inc. v The Association of Professional Engineers
    Geoscientists of Alberta Appeal Board 2014 ABCA 58 Alberta Court of Appeal 2014
    Lovely v. Prestige Travel Ltd 2013 ABQB 467 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Bonsma v Tesco Corporation 2013 ABCA 367 Alberta Court of Appeal 2013
    Lana v. University of Alberta 2012 ABQB 97 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2012
    Opal v. Boyd 2008 ABCA 25 Alberta Court of Appeal 2008
    Krys v. Brown 2008 ABCA 123 Alberta Court of Appeal 2008
    Tonizzo v. Moysa 2007 ABQB 245 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2007
    Speirs v. Royal Alex
    ra Hospital (2007) 430 A.R. 215 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2007
    Stoddard v. Montague (2006) 412 A.R. 88 Alberta Court of Appeal 2006
    Best v. Hoskins (2006) 390 A.R. 1 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2006
    Percy v. Kieser (2005) 54 Alta. L.R. (4th) 329 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2005

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2005, Alberta
    2011, Northwest Territories
    Memberships

    Professional

    Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Labour and Employment Law Section (North)
    Member
    2005-Present
    Canadian Bar Association Alberta, Administrative Law Section (North)
    Member
    2005-Present
    Law Society of Alberta
    Member
    2004-Present
    Alberta Association of Architects
    Public Member of Council
    2012 - 2016

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    McGill University
    Class of 1999
    Bachelor of Science

    University of Alberta
    Class of 2004
    with Distinction

    University of Alberta
    Class of 2004
    Bachelor of Laws

Gregory Sim

Partner at Field Law
1.0
1 review

2500 - 10175 101 Street NWEdmonton, AB T5J 0H3Canada

Show on map

Email Gregory Sim

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions