×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Field LawCounsel
Donald (Dino) McLaughlin

Donald (Dino) McLaughlin

4.8
1 review

2500 - 10175 101 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T5J 0H3

Class Actions, Constitutional, Health and 1 more

About Donald (Dino) McLaughlin

Donald (Dino) McLaughlin is a lawyer practicing class actions, constitutional, health and 1 other area of law. Donald (Dino) received a degree from University of Alberta in 1978, and has been licensed for 44 years. Donald (Dino) practices at Field Law in Edmonton, AB.

Donald (Dino) McLaughlin (Edmonton, Alberta)

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Donald (Dino) McLaughlin got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Donald (Dino)

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.8
See All Reviews
1
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
100%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
4.0
Value for Money
5.0
Family Law
Posted by anonymous
June 21, 2019
Hired Attorney

Speaks eloquently, without notes, and quietly, while remaining focused on getting answers without seeming to ask a question. Often wears recycled suits to work, and volunteers for street-people or the organizations that try to help them.

Services

Areas of Law

  • Class Actions
  • Other 3
    • Constitutional
    • Health
    • Legislative Reform + Development

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Counsel
    Firm Name
    Field Law
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Reported Cases: The reported cases below belong to Dino
    are representative of Dino's experience. R v Hall 2014 ABCA 401 Alberta Court of Appeal 2014
    McMorran v Alberta Pension Services Corporation 2014 ABCA 387 Alberta Court of Appeal 2014
    Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v Alberta 2013 ABQB 649 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    McMorran v McMorran 2013 ABQB 610 Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta 2013
    Buelow v. Morrissey 2013 ABQB 277 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v. Alberta Health Services 2012 ABCA 355 Alberta Court of Appeal 2012
    Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v Alberta 2011 ABQB 801 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2011
    Bruce Estate v. Toderovich 2010 ABQB 709 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2010
    Conner v. Bruketa Estate 2010 ABQB 517 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2010
    Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v. Alberta 2009 ABCA 403 Alberta Court of Appeal 2009
    Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v. Alberta 2008 ABQB 490 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2008
    L. H. v. Smith 2008 ABQB 434 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2008
    Doull v. Alberta (Public Guardian) 2008 ABCA 163 Alberta Court of Appeal 2008
    R. v. G.J.S. 2007 ABQB 757 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2007
    Ro/Lin Holdings Ltd. v. Mustard Seed Street Church 2007 ABCA 274 Alberta Court of Appeal 2007
    Ro/Lin Holdings Ltd. v. Mustard Seed Street Church 2007 ABCA 259 Alberta Court of Appeal 2007
    Calvert Home Mortgage Investment Corp. v. Ro/Lin Holdings Ltd. 2006 ABQB 951 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2006
    Hansen v. Misericordia Hospital 2006 ABQB 941 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2006
    Kainth v. Capital Health Authority 2006 ABQB 401 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2006
    Speirs v. Royal Alex
    ra Hospitals 2003 ABQB 3 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2003
    R. v. McKay 2002 ABQB 435 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2002
    Steinbrenner v. Caritas Health Group 2001 ABQB 533 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2001
    R. v. Penner [2001] A.J. No 1749 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2001
    W. (T.) v. University of Alberta Hospital 2000 ABQB 387 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2000
    Yakemchuk v. Yakemchuk 2000 ABQB Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2000
    Keller v. Penkoske 1999 ABQB 912 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 1999
    W.V.W. v. Misericordia Hospital 1999 ABQB 579 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 1999
    S.P.F. v. R.A.F. 1998 ABQB 32 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 1998

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1982, Alberta
    Memberships

    Professional

    Law Society of Alberta
    Member
    Edmonton Bar Association
    Member

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    University of Alberta
    Class of 1978
    Bachelor of Education

    University of Alberta
    Class of 1981
    Bachelor of Laws

Donald (Dino) McLaughlin

Counsel at Field Law
4.8
1 review

2500 - 10175 101 Street NWEdmonton, AB T5J 0H3Canada

Show on map

Email Donald (Dino) McLaughlin

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions