×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Field LawPartner
Steve Eichler

Steve Eichler

1.3
1 review

400 - 444 7 AVE SW, Calgary, AB AB T2P 0X8

Cannabis, Criminal, Education and 6 more

About Steve Eichler

Steve Eichler is a lawyer practicing cannabis, criminal, education and 6 other areas of law. Steve received a degree from Carleton University, Ottawa in 1990, and has been licensed for 30 years. Steve practices at Field Law in Calgary, AB.

Steve Eichler (Calgary, Alberta)

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Steve

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
1.3
See All Reviews
1
1.3
Lawyers.com
1
4.4
Martindale
1
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
100%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Responsiveness
2.0
Value for Money
1.0
Labor and Employment
Posted by Charles
April 29, 2023
Hired Attorney

Terrible. Paid by the Alberta Teachers union, and had zero interest in the outcome of my case. I felt like he was only doing it out of contact obligation with the ATA. He showed up late with cycling gear on and didn't even read my case notes. Capitulation with the opposition for an easy close seems to be the modus operandi of this firm; certainly with this lazy "attorney at law". Wish I could go back in time and insist on a different firm, or at least a different lawyer who is more focused on his client than his music hobby. 0/10 NO TEETH

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 9
    • Cannabis
    • Criminal
    • Education
    • Labour + Employment
    • Media + Entertainment
    • Northern Canada
    • Occupational Health + Safety
    • Professional Regulatory
    • Workplace Human Rights

Practice Details

  • Languages
    French; Hebrew
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Field Law
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Reported Cases: Ashraf v. SNC Lavalin ATP Inc. 2017 ABCA 95 Alberta Court of Appeal 2017
    Ashraf v. SNC Lavalin ATP Inc. 2015 ABCA 78 Court of Appeal of Alberta 2015
    Ashraf v SNC Lavalin ATP Inc. 2014 ABQB 220 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2014
    R. v. Miller 2013 ABPC 323 Provincial Court of Alberta 2013
    Ashraf v. SNC Lavalin ATP Inc. 2013 ABQB 688 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2013
    R. v. Carter Industries Ltd. 2011 NWTTC 8 Territorial Court of the Northwest Territotires 2011
    R. v. Leong 2011 ABPC 151 Provincial Court of Alberta 2011
    R. v. Kidco Construction Ltd. 2009 ABPC 195 Alberta Provincial Court 2009
    V.A.H. v. Lynch 2009 ABCA 221 Alberta Court of Appeal 2009
    V.A.H. v. Lynch 2008 ABQB 448 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2008
    Hennessy v. Horse Racing Alberta 2007 ABQB 178 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2007
    Hennessy v. Horse Racing Alberta 2006 ABQB 903 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2006
    R.v. Andrews [2006] A.J. No. 220 Alberta Provincial Court, Civil Division 2006
    Rankin v. Alberta Curling Federation Appeals Committee [2005] A.J. No. 1759 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2005
    Alberta Racing Corp. v. Resortport Development Corp. 2004 ABCA 139 Alberta Court of Appeal 2004
    R.v. T.D.M. [2004] A.J. No. 9 Alberta Provincial Court, Civil Division 2004
    Greenwood v. Alberta (Appeals Tribunal) [2003] A.J. No. 471 Alberta Court of Queen's Bench 2003
    Chuck Corothers Building Ltd. v. Royal North Industries Ltd. [1998] NWTR 114 (NWTSC) Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories 1998
    Look v. Vittrekwa [1998] N.W.T.J. No. 41 Northwest Territories Supreme Court 1998
    R.v. B.H.K. [1998] N.W.T.J. No. 147 Northwest Territories Supreme Court 1998
    Northwest Territories Registered Nurses Assn. v. MacKenzie Regional Health Services [1998] N.W.T.J. No. 115 Northwest Territories Supreme Court 1998
    R.v. Camsell [1998] N.W.T.J. No. 112 Northwest Territories Supreme Court 1998
    R.v. Diveky [1998] N.W.T.J No. 31 Northwest Territories Supreme Court 1998
    NWT Registered Nurses Association v. MacKenzie Regional Health Services [1998] 23 CPC (4th) 115 (NWTSC) Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories 1998
    Delorme v. Speirs [1997] N.W.T.J. No.25 Northwest Territories Supreme Courtvv 1997
    Chuck Corothers Building Materials Ltd. (c.o.b. Beaver Lumber) v. Royal North Industries Ltd. [1997] N.W.T.J. No. 92 Northwest Territories Supreme Court 1997
    Chuck Corothers Building Materials Ltd. (c.o.b. Beaver Lumber) v. Royal North Industries Ltd. [1997] N.W.T.J. No. 162 Northwest Territories Supreme Court 1997
    R.v. Pound [1997] N.W.T.J. No. 145 Northwest Territories Supreme Court 1997

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1996, Alberta
    1996, Northwest Territories
    Memberships

    Professional

    Calgary Bar Association
    Member
    1999-Present
    Law Society of Northwest Territories, Admissions Committee
    Member
    1996-1998, 2010-Present
    Canadian Bar Association
    Member
    1996-Present
    Law Society of Alberta
    Member
    1996-Present
    Law Society of Northwest Territories
    Member
    1996-Present
    Field Law Executive Committee
    Member
    2016-2021

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    Carleton University, Ottawa
    Class of 1990
    Bachelor of Arts

    Carleton University, Ottawa
    Class of 1990
    with Honours

    University of Calgary
    Class of 1995
    Bachelor of Laws

Email Steve Eichler

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions