×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Robert Michael Asher

Robert Michael Asher

Not yet reviewed

125 Summer Street, 11th Floor, Boston, MA 02110

Patent Litigation, Patent Prosecution, Electronic Patents and 4 more

About Robert Michael Asher

Robert Michael Asher is a lawyer practicing patent litigation, patent prosecution, electronic patents and 4 other areas of law. Robert received a B.S.E.E. degree from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1978, and has been licensed for 45 years. Robert practices at Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP in Boston, MA.

Robert Michael Asher (Boston, Massachusetts)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Robert Michael Asher got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Robert

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 7
    • Patent Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Electronic Patents
    • Computer and Software Patents
    • Trademark Protection
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Inter Partes Reviews

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Cases: Exergen Corp. v. KAZ USA, Inc.
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    VLT, Inc. v. Power One, Inc.
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (lead attorney)
    Astec International v. Sharp Electronics
    U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
    Plasma Physics v. Sanyo Electric
    Sears Roebuck
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
    Gates Formed Fibre v. Delaware Valley Corp.
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Terry Scheller v. Leather Loft Store et al.
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Andrew Corp v. Gabriel Electronics, Inc.
    U.S. District Court for the District of Maine
    Knop et al. v. Allen
    U.S. District Court for the District of Maine (interference)
    ICTV v. Worldgate
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    3M v. Briteline
    U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
    McGuire et al. v . Acufex
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Amgen v. Hoffman La Roche
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Bowers v. Baystate Technologies
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Vornado v. Duracraft
    U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas
    Scansoft, Inc. v. ART Advanced Recognition Technologies
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Honeywell Consumer Products, Inc. v. Windmere Corp.
    White Westinghouse
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Honeywell Consumer Products, Inc. v. Windmere Corp.
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Lemelson v. United States
    Cincinnati Milacron
    U.S. Court of Claims
    Bryant v. Electronics Corporation of America
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Etonic v. Weight-Rite Golf Corp.
    U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1983, Massachusetts
    US Patent and Trademark Office
    Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
    First Circuit Court of Appeals
    Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
    US Supreme Court
    Registered patent attorney 30,445 United States Patent and Trademark office.
    1981, Illinois
    Memberships
    Boston Bar Association
    American Bar Association (Member, Sections on: Litigation
    Intellectual Property Law)
    Boston Patent Law Association
    American Intellectual Property Law Association
    Federal Circuit Bar Association
    International Intellectual Property Association.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Harvard University
    Class of 1981
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Class of 1978
    B.S.E.E.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1956
    Harvey, Illinois, August 27, 1956

Email Robert Michael Asher

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions