×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Patricia Lang Farnsworth

Patricia Lang Farnsworth

Not yet reviewed

88 Black Falcon Avenue, Suite 345, Boston, MA 02210

Business and Commercial Law, Mergers and Acquisitions, Business Formations and 5 more

About Patricia Lang Farnsworth

Patricia Lang Farnsworth is a lawyer practicing business and commercial law, mergers and acquisitions, business formations and 5 other areas of law. Patricia received a B.S.N. degree from Salem State College in 1985, and has been licensed for 33 years. Patricia practices at Lawson & Weitzen, LLP in Boston, MA.

Patricia Lang Farnsworth (Boston, Massachusetts)

Reviews for Patricia

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property
  • Other 7
    • Business and Commercial Law
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Business Formations
    • Employment Law
    • Alcoholic Beverage Licensing
    • Retail Food and Hospitality
    • Banking and Financing

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Lawson & Weitzen, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    In re: Assinippi Liquors, Inc., Wareham (ABCC decision dated June 8, 2004): Commission held that the policy behind a “sting” operation should be the education of licensees in the risks associated with selling alcoholic beverages without requesting proof of age
    Commission disapproved a twenty (20) day suspension for failure of a compliance check as unreasonable.In re: Saba Foodmarket, Haverhill (ABCC decision dated June 27, 2012): Commission finding the penalty of revocation of a license for a violation occurring solely as the result of a compliance check draconian, unfair
    unreasonableDonohue Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Donohue's vs. Watertown Licensing Board (Middlesex Superior Court #MICV2012-03178 decision dated April 25, 2013): Upheld Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission finding local board had no authority to require that licensed premises close prior to 11:00 P.M. since M.G.L. ch. 138 section 33 requires sales must be permitted between 11:00 A.M.
    11:00 P.M.
    further holding that a patio is part of the licensed premises
    as such, the local board cannot m
    ate that the licensee close a portion of its premises for any part of the year.Ballarin, Inc. v. Licensing Board of Boston, 49 Mass. App. Ct. 506 (2000).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1993, Massachusetts
    1994, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
    1994, U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit
    1998, U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships
    American Bar Association - Member
    Women's Bar Association - Member.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    New England School of Law
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Salem State College
    Class of 1985
    B.S.N.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1963
    Cambridge, Massachusetts, March 17, 1963

Email Patricia Lang Farnsworth

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Patricia Lang Farnsworth was admitted in 1993 to the State of Massachusetts.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Patricia Lang Farnsworth is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and United States Supreme Court.
  • Does this attorney accept major credit cards?
    Yes, Patricia Lang Farnsworth will accept American Express, Visa and MasterCard.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Patricia Lang Farnsworth attended New England School of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Lawson & Weitzen, LLP was established in 1973.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions