×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

L Sorrentino8

4.6
11 reviews

south west, Blanding, UT 98547, U.S.A.

Intellectual Property, Administrative Agency Practice, Administrative Hearings and Appeals and 7 more

MEET OUR TEAM

Raghu
Create4

About L Sorrentino8

L Sorrentino8 is a law firm with an office in Blanding, UT. At this office location, there is 1 lawyer practicing intellectual property, administrative agency practice, administrative hearings and appeals and 7 other areas of law.

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for L Sorrentino8

Have you consulted or hired this firm?

Leave a review about your experience with this firm.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.6
See All Reviews
11
Showing 1-10 of 11 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
55%
4 stars
36%
3 stars
9%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
4.6
Quality of Service
4.6
Responsiveness
4.8
Value for Money
4.5
Immigration
Posted by anonymous
June 02, 2011
Hired Law Firm

A great company.

Administrative Hearings and Appeals
Posted by anonymous
February 22, 2019
Hired Law Firm
Banking Law
Posted by anonymous
March 05, 2013
Hired Law Firm

Test survey to check the session issue.

Response from L Sorrentino8
March 05, 2013
test comment
Banking Law
Posted by anonymous
September 29, 2010
Hired Law Firm
General Practice
Posted by anonymous
September 09, 2011
Hired Law Firm
Bankruptcy
Posted by anonymous
February 08, 2010
Hired Law Firm
Administrative Law
Posted by anonymous
October 19, 2012
Hired Law Firm

This firm handled my issue timely and provided information every step of the way till my case was completed.

Bankruptcy
Posted by anonymous
August 13, 2009
Hired Law Firm

Taxi wig a testy

Bankruptcy
Posted by anonymous
September 13, 2010
Hired Law Firm

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property
  • Administrative Law 5
    • Administrative Agency Practice
    • Administrative Hearings and Appeals
    • Administrative Litigation
    • Federal Administrative Law
    • Judicial Review
  • Drug and Medical Device Litigation 1
    • Acetaminophen
  • Resorts and Leisure 1
    • Resort Timeshares
  • Benzene Exposure

Office Details

  • Languages

    Spanish
    French
    Hindi.

  • Firm History
    Former/Historical Names

    (Formerly Letterman and Letterman). / Letterman and Letterman, 1982-1994; Letterman and Associates, 1994-2003

  • Partnership & Affiliations
    Partnerships

    An Association of Independent AttorneysAn Association of Attorneys including a Professional CorporationAn Association of AttorneysA Law AssociationA Professional Limited Liability Company

  • State Bar Summary

    All firm Members are members of the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property. All Members and Associates are members of the New Jersey State Bar Association.

    All firm Members are members of the Greater New York Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property.

  • Representative Clients

    REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS: Lucent Corp.; Apple Corp.; Datascape, Inc.; TelCom 1, Inc.; TelCom Wireless; Advanced Cellular, Inc.; Ameritech Corp.; Tel Tron Group; Osirus Electronics, Inc.; America On Line, Inc.; Compuserve Corp.



    Reference: First Valley National Bank, Union, New Jersey.

L Sorrentino8

4.6
11 reviews

741, hwerhh avenue, south westBlanding, UT 98547U.S.A.

Show on map
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions