×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Crowley Fleck PLLPPartner
Steven Robert Milch

Steven Robert Milch

Not yet reviewed

490 North 31st Street, Billings, MT 59103

Appellate, Appeals, Civil Rights and 16 more

About Steven Robert Milch

Steven Robert Milch is a lawyer practicing appellate, appeals, civil rights and 16 other areas of law. Steven received a B.A. degree from Montana State University in 1979, and has been licensed for 39 years. Steven practices at Crowley Fleck PLLP in Billings, MT.

Steven Robert Milch (Billings, Montana)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Steven Robert Milch got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Steven

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Civil Rights
  • Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Natural Resources 1
    • Oil and Gas
  • Personal Injury
  • Products Liability
  • Other 13
    • Appellate
    • Appeals
    • Business Organizations
    • Class Action
    • Commercial
    • Native Peoples Law
    • Employee Benefits, ERISA & Executive Compensation
    • ERISA Litigation
    • Indian Law
    • Tort Litigation
    • Class Action Defense
    • Product Liability Defense
    • Unfair Trade Practices Act

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Crowley Fleck PLLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Reported Decisions / Cases: BNSF Railway Co. v. Eddy, 2020 MT 59, 399 Mont. 180, 459 P.3d 857 (2020)
    Estate of Foster v. American Marine SVS Group Benefit Plan, 2019 WL 7020192 (D.Mont. Dec. 20, 2019)
    AT&T Corporation v. Jackson Utilities, LLC, 725 Fed.Appx. 584 (9th Cir. 2018)
    Reed v. Lieurance, 863 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir. 2017)
    Montana Health Network, Inc. v. Great Falls Orthopedic Associates, 379 Mont. 513, 353 P.3d 483 (2015)
    Sheridan Elec. Co-op, Inc. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities, 377 Mont. 296, 340 P.3d 529 (2014)
    Frontline Processing Corp. v. Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum Perlman & Nagelberg LLP, 571 Fed.Appx. 586, 2014 WL 1664296 (9th Cir. 2014)
    Peterson v. Time Ins. Co., 562 Fed.Appx. 566, 2014 WL 962015 (9th Cir. 2014)
    Conway v. Benefis Health System, Inc., 369 Mont. 309, 297 P.3d 1200 (2013)
    Peterson v. Time Ins. Co., 2012 WL 1755166 (D.Mont. 2012), aff'd, 562 Fed. Appx. 566 (9th Cir. 2014)
    Gatlin-Johnson ex rel. Gatlin v. City of Miles City, 367 Mont. 414, 291 P.3d 1129 (2012)
    Goolsby v. Raney, 483 Fed.Appx. 326, 2012 WL 1831161 (9th Cir. 2012)
    Slack v. L
    mark Co., 362 Mont. 514, 267 P.3d 6 (2011)
    In re Gallatin County, 450 Fed.Appx. 624, 2011 WL 4351620 (9th Cir. 2011)
    Josephs ex rel. Estate of Leibrock-Josephs v. Gallatin County, 385 Fed.Appx. 671, 2010 WL 2617805 (9th Cir. 2010)
    Paull v. Park County, 352 Mont. 465, 218 P.3d 1198 (2009)
    Gonzales v. City of Bozeman, 352 Mont. 145, 217 P.3d 487 (2009)
    Park County Concerned Citizens v. DePuy, 344 Mont. 504, 190 P.3d 293 (2008)
    Silvestrone v. Park County, 339 Mont. 299, 170 P.3d 950 (2007)
    Essex Ins. Co. v. Moose's Saloon, Inc., 338 Mont. 423, 166 P.3d 451 (2007)
    In re Blatter, 241 Fed.Appx. 371, 2007 WL 1991148 (9th Cir. 2007)
    Nickel v. Woods, 229 Fed.Appx. 432, 2007 WL 954329 (9th Cir. 2007)
    Eklund v. Trost, 335 Mont. 112, 151 P.3d 870 (2006)
    Lee v. Musselshell County, 320 Mont. 294, 87 P.3d 423 (2004)
    Dorwart v. Caraway, 312 Mont. 1, 58 P.3d 128 (2002)
    Shepherd v. Carbon County Bd. of Comm'rs, 309 Mont. 391, 46 P.3d 634 (2002)
    Trochmann v. County of Musselshell, 7 Fed. Appx. 630, 2001 WL 291158 (9th Cir. 2001)
    Lopez v. Musselshell County, 300 Mont. 544, 8 P.3d 123 (2000)
    Bedrejo v. Triple E Canada, Ltd., 295 Mont. 430, 984 P.2d 739 (1999)
    Dorwart v. Caraway, 290 Mont. 196, 966 P.2d 1121 (1998)
    Shields v. Helena School Dist. No. 1, 284 Mont. 138, 943 P. 2d 999 (1997)
    Montana Metal Bldgs., Inc. v. Shapiro, 283 Mont. 471, 942 P.2d 694 (1997)
    G
    y v. Eschler, 261 Mont. 355, 862 P.2d 1116 (1993)
    Eschler v. Eschler, 257 Mont. 360, 849 P.2d 196 (1993)
    Anderson v. Merit Systems Protection Bd., 12 F.3d 1069, 1993 WL 517357 (Fed.Cir. 1993)
    U.S. v. Juvenile Male, 930 F.2d 727, 1991 WL 51331 (9th Cir. 1991)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1987, Idaho
    1987, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
    1989, Montana
    1990, Fort Peck Tribal Court
    1990, Crow Tribal Court
    1992, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
    1992, U.S. Supreme Court
    2021, District of Columbia Court of Appeals
    1989, Montana
    1987, Idaho
    Memberships

    Professional Affiliations

    • American Bar Association (Litigation Appellate Practice Committee)
    • Montana Defense Trial Lawyers Association
    • Yellowstone Area Bar Association
    • Defense Research Institute (DRI)
    • ABA, Civil Rights Litigation Committee
    • State Bar of Montana

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Idaho
    Class of 1987
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University of Idaho
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Montana State University
    Class of 1979
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1957
    Great Falls, Montana, May 25, 1957

Steven Robert Milch

Partner at Crowley Fleck PLLP
Not yet reviewed

500 Transwestern II, 490 North 31st StreetBillings, MT 59103U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Gerry P. Fagan
Pro
Gerry P. Fagan
4.7
18
Appellate Practice lawyer
406-409-4544
View Profile
Jordan Walter FitzGerald
Pro
Jordan Walter FitzGerald
4.7
4
Appellate Practice lawyer
406-831-6362
View Profile
Adam Warren
Pro
Adam Warren
4.6
21
Appellate Practice lawyer
406-831-7163
View Profile
Calvin J. Stacey
Pro
Calvin J. Stacey
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

833-780-5128
View Profile
Carey E. Matovich
Pro
Carey E. Matovich
5.0
9
Appellate Practice lawyer
406-743-1172
View Profile

Email Steven Robert Milch

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions