×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Mr. Steven Grant Hill

Mr. Steven Grant Hill

Not yet reviewed

3625 Cumberland Blvd. SE, Suite 1050 Suite 1050, Atlanta, GA 30339

Intellectual Property Litigation, Patent, Copyright and 7 more

About Mr. Steven Grant Hill

Mr. Steven Grant Hill is a lawyer practicing intellectual property litigation, patent, copyright and 7 other areas of law. Steven received a B.A. degree from Southern Methodist University, and has been licensed for 32 years. Steven practices at Hill, Kertscher & Wharton, LLP in Atlanta, GA.

Mr. Steven Grant Hill (Atlanta, Georgia)

Reviews for Steven

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 2
    • Trade Secrets
    • Intellectual Property Licensing
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 1
    • Unfair Competition
  • Other 6
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patent
    • Copyright
    • Trademark Law
    • Inter Partes Review
    • Technology Law

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates: $540/hr
    Fixed fees available
    Contingency Fee: 40%
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Other - Paypal
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Hill, Kertscher & Wharton, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Michael Foundation, Inc. v. Urantia Foundation, 61 Fed.Appx. 538, 2003 WL 986723, 10th Cir.(Okla.) 2003 Copr.L.Dec. P 28,587, 10th Cir.(Okla.), Mar 11, 2003
    Urantia Foundation v. Maaherra, 210 F.3d 387, 2000 WL 59914, 9th Cir.(Ariz.), Jan 24, 2000
    Urantia Foundation v. Maaherra, 114 F.3d 955, 1997 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,653, 43 U.S.P.Q.2d 1001, 25 Media L. Rep. 1873, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4369, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7285, 9th Cir.(Ariz.), Jun 10, 1997
    Hooters of America et al v. Winghouse et al, 347 F.Supp.2d 1256, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 317, M.D.Fla., Dec 13, 2004
    Arrival Star v. Descartes Systems, 2004 WL 2496622, S.D.N.Y., Nov 05, 2004
    Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc., 2004 WL 555622, N.D.Tex., Mar 16, 2004
    Highmark v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc., 304 F.Supp.2d 663, W.D.Pa., Nov 7, 2003
    Scientel, LLC v. Ritz, 2002 WL 31664008, N.D.Ga., Sep 09, 2002.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1994, Georgia
    U.S. Courts of Appeals, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh and Federal Circuits
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia and U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
    Memberships
    American Intellectual Property Law Association (2002-present)
    State Bar of Georgia (1994-present)
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Vanderbilt University School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    Best Oral Advocate

    Vanderbilt University School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    1994 Vanderbilt National Moot Court Team

    Vanderbilt University School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    National Health Law Moot Court Competition

    Vanderbilt University School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    Third Place

    Vanderbilt University School of Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    National Health Law Moot Court Competition
    Other Education
    Southern Methodist University
    B.A.
    1991 Most Outstanding Senior Student Award

    Southern Methodist University
    B.A.
    Texas State Collegiate Debate Champion

    Southern Methodist University
    B.A.
    1991 Phi Beta Kappa

    Southern Methodist University
    B.A.
    President's Scholar

    Southern Methodist University
    B.A.
    National Collegiate Debate Champion

    Oxford University

Email Mr. Steven Grant Hill

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions