×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Hall Booth Smith, P.C.Partner
Mr. Daniel Richardson
Pro

Mr. Daniel Richardson

Not yet reviewed

191 Peachtree Street, NE, Atlanta, GA 30303

Workers' Compensation

About Mr. Daniel Richardson

Daniel Richardson is a partner in the Atlanta office of Hall Booth Smith. He specializes in defending employers in all aspects of workers compensation claims throughout Georgia. Previously he served as a trial attorney in the District Attorney’s office in Coweta County, where he successfully tried several jury trials and defended verdicts through appeals to the Georgia Court of Appeals and Supreme Court of Georgia. Currently, he represents school districts; insurance companies; industrial companies specializing in flooring, roofing, and automobile manufacture; and several small businesses. Daniel has extensive experience negotiating and mediating claims to successful resolution. Though many claims resolve through settlement, he is also adept at defending claims at an administrative hearing and handling all levels of appeal. Daniel’s goal is to understand the needs of your business and to bring his expertise to bear in helping you meet those needs in a timely and cost-effective way.

Presentations

•Controlling the Medical in Georgia Workers’ Compensation
HBS Workers’ Compensation Webinar; January 11, 2024

Publications

•2024 Proposed Board Rule Changes in Georgia Workers’ Compensation
HBS Workers’ Compensation Blog; May 22, 2024
•Prominence vs. Accessibility in Posting Panels in Georgia
HBS Workers’ Compensation Blog; June 13, 2023
•Change-in-Condition SOL and the Mailbox Rule in Georgia
HBS Workers’ Compensation Blog, September 2021
•The Scheduled Break Exception vs. Ingress and Egress
State Bar of Georgia Workers’ Compensation Law Section Newsletter, Summer 2021
•Georgia’s COA Applies Supreme Court’s Overruling of Lunch Break Exception
HBS Workers’ Compensation Blog, June 2021

In the Press

Lump Sum Settlements and WC Subrogation: Georgia COA Reinforces Burden on Employers and Insurers

November 10, 2025

Attorney Daniel Richardson dives into the recent Georgia Court of Appeals decision in McLeod v. BITCO Insurance Companies.

 

Mr. Daniel Richardson (Atlanta, Georgia) View website

Reviews for Mr. Daniel Richardson

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 1
    • Workers' Compensation

Practice Details

  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Hall Booth Smith, P.C.
  • Additional Links
    http://www.hallboothsmith.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2016, Georgia
    2016, Georgia Superior Courts
    2016, Georgia State Courts
    2016, Georgia Court of Appeals
    2016, Supreme Court of Georgia
    Memberships

    Memberships

    Coweta County Bar Association
    Sovereign Hope Church

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Georgia State University
    Class of 2016
    J.D.
    magna cum laude
    Other Education
    Georgia Institute of Technology
    Class of 2010
    B.S.
    Industrial and Systems Engineering

Contact Mr. Daniel Richardson

Partner at Hall Booth Smith, P.C.
Not yet reviewed

Suite 2900, 191 Peachtree Street, NEAtlanta, GA 30303U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 678.539.1524
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM

Activity

Legal Community Contributions

Email Mr. Daniel Richardson

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Mr. Daniel Richardson was admitted in 2016 to the State of Georgia, Georgia, Georgia and Georgia.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Mr. Daniel Richardson is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Mr. Daniel Richardson attended Georgia State University.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Hall Booth Smith, P.C. was established in 1989.
  • Is this attorney listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers?
    Mr. Daniel Richardson is listed in the Civil Trial Practice, Insurance Defense, Intellectual Property Law and Medical Malpractice section of the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions