Yana Berrier

Attorney in Yuba City, CA
Valedictorian. Best Individual Performance, Trial Advocacy. Best Overall, Appellate Advocacy.

Experienced family law attorney Yana Berrier brings thoroughness, knowledge and enthusiasm to every case in which she is involved.

Ms. Berrier graduated Valedictorian, Summa Cum Laude, from Lincoln Law School in Sacramento, California, with the highest grade point average in history of Lincoln Law School at the time of her graduation. Ms. Berrier received awards for the highest grades in her graduating class in Contracts, Evidence, Real Property, Wills & Trusts, Constitutional Law, Bankruptcy, and Trial Advocacy.

Ms. Berrier represents clients in Yuba, Sutter, Colusa, Sacramento, and Placer County Superior Courts, and the Office of Disability Adjudication & Review.

Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Marital Dissolution
  • Legal Separation
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Restraining Orders
  • Social Security Disability and SSI


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2002, California

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    Lincoln Law School
    Class of 2002
    summa cum laude

    University Attended

    California State University, Sacramento
    Class of 1992

    Associations & Memberships

    State Bar of California.

    Contact Information


    530-674-2258 Call Now


    Send email to Yana Berrier

    Office Information
    Yana Berrier
     1510 Poole Boulevard, Suite 103,
    Yuba City, CA 95993


    Law Office of Yana Berrier (Yuba City, California)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.