Daniel D. D'Agostino

Attorney in York, SC
Omicron Delta Epsilon. Moot Court Society. Recipient: Bureau of National Affairs Award. Chairman, Board of Directors, Children's Attention Home. Member, Catawba Community Mental Health Foundation.

Areas of Law

  • Civil Torts
  • Criminal
  • Domestic Relations
  • Real Estate
  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation


Overall Client Rating

4.3 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 5 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 04/18/13
Posted by a Consumer on 04/18/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Mr. D'Agostino successfully brought to a close a protracted child support litigation that was being pursued against me by DSS. In doing so he was required to navigate through the laws and requirements of three states with regard to child support. He eventually prevailed and even managed to obtain legal fees from DSS despite the statutory provision excluding them.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1992, South Carolina
1993, North Carolina, U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina and U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Law School Attended

Emory University
Class of 1992

University Attended

Emory University
Class of 1988

Birth Information

Born in 1966
Stamford, Connecticut, May 13, 1966

Associations & Memberships

York County Bar Association (Past President, Vice President); South Carolina Bar; North Carolina State Bar; American Bar Association.

Representative Cases

Stevens v. Allens, 342 S.C. 47, 586 SE2d 663 (2000); Roberts v. State, 318 SC 218, 456 SE2d 905 (1995); Wyatt v. Fowler, 3026 SC 97, 484 SE2d 590 (1987).

Contact Information




Send email to Daniel D. D

Office Information
Daniel D. D'Agostino
 25 W. Liberty St., P.O. Box 1199,
York, SC 29745-1199


D'Agostino & D'Agostino, L.L.P. (York, South Carolina)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.