John E. Hogan

Attorney in Woodbridge, NJ
John Hogan, a shareholder, first joined Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A. in 1999. He concentrates his practice in the areas of criminal defense, appellate matters, administrative law, and civil rights litigation. Mr. Hogan was recognized by the Woodbridge Metro Chamber of Commerce in 2008 as Citizen of the Year. In 2009, he was selected for inclusion as one of NJBiz's Forty Under 40 for his community leadership and professional achievements. In addition, Mr. Hogan has been honored by the Middlesex County Bar Association as its Young Lawyer of the Year for 2010. He has been selected for inclusion by New Jersey Super Lawyers-Rising Stars Edition each year since 2006. Mr. Hogan is Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Woodbridge Metro Chamber of Commerce. He is a past member of the State Board of Trustees of the American Conference on Diversity and past chair of its Central Jersey chapter and remains an active supporter of the organization and its mission. He is a Trustee of the Trial Attorneys of New Jersey and co-chair of the Middlesex County Bar Association's Municipal Court Practice Committee. Mr. Hogan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Woodbridge Metro Chamber of Commerce and actively supports the Raritan Bay Healthcare Foundation. Mr. Hogan has published articles entitled The Feasibility of Internet Gambling Regulation (1998); How The Patriot Act Affects Noncitizens (2002); How To Prevent Losing Your Business To Retail Larceny (2003); Domestic Violence and the Unfortunate Byproduct of Police Conducted Pretextual Searches for Contraband (2007) and Collateral Consequences: The Potential for Deportation and Exclusion as a Result of a Municipal Court Shoplifting Conviction (2010) . He was also Special Editor of the December 2010 Edition of New Jersey Lawyer Magazine. Mr. Hogan has served as a periodic guest lecturer on Federal Civil Procedure at St. John's University.

Mr. Hogan is a member of the Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys of New Jersey, the Middlesex County Bar Association, the Monmouth County Bar Association, and the New Jersey State Bar Association. He is a graduate of the Haydn Proctor Inn of Court. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Hogan completed a clerkship in the Criminal Part of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, with the Honorable Michael D. Farren, P.J.Cr., and the Honorable Vincent E. Hull, Jr., J.S.C.

Area of Emphasis

Federal, State, and Municipal Court Criminal Defense
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings
Police Disciplinary Charges
Administrative and Departmental Hearings
Motor Vehicle Commission Hearings
Plaintiff and Defense Oriented Civil Rights Litigation
Healthcare Claims Fraud
Liquor License Proceedings

Lawyer Videos

• New Jersey Probationary Driving Program

Lawyer Publications

•Collateral Consequences
•New Jersey's Implied Consent Law - The Proof is in the Procedure

732.855.6470
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law
  • Criminal Law/Civil Rights Department
  • Appellate Lawyers

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Shareholder

Admission Details

Admitted in 1998, New Jersey
1998, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
1999, New York
2010, Supreme Court of the United States

Law School Attended

Seton Hall University School of Law
Class of 1998
J.D.
cum laude

University Attended

Providence College
Class of 1995
B.A.
cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1972
Long Branch, New Jersey, November 26, 1972

Representative Cases

Reported Court Opinions; Jackson v. Fauver

Community Contributions

Contact Information

Phone

732.855.6470

Fax

732.726.6629

Email

Send email to John E. Hogan


Office Information
John E. Hogan
Shareholder
 90 Woodbridge Center Drive, Suite 900, Box 10,
Woodbridge, NJ 07095

Loading...

Logo
Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A. (Woodbridge, New Jersey)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.