Christine F. Marks

Attorney in Woodbridge, NJ

Counsel, Litigation Department
Member, Banking, Business Financing & Creditors' Rights Practice Group
Member, Community Association Practice Group
Member, Construction Practice Group

Practice Focus

Ms. Marks' practice focuses on commercial litigation, construction and community association litigation, banking litigation, and estate litigation focusing on guardianship actions.

Professional Activities / Honors

· Member of the Middlesex County Bar Association.

· Member of the Trial Attorneys of New Jersey.

· While attending law school, she was a member of the Constitutional Law Journal.

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Banking
  • Business Financing & Creditors' Rights
  • Litigation
  • Community Association
  • Construction


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

4.4 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1990, New Jersey
1990, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
1997, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Law School Attended

Seton Hall University School of Law
Class of 1990
magna cum laude

University Attended

Seton Hall University
Class of 1987
magna cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1965
Plainfield, New Jersey, March 23, 1965

Associations & Memberships

Middlesex County Bar Association (Member, Women's Section); New Jersey Women Lawyers Association; Trial Attorneys of New Jersey.

Contact Information






Send email to Christine F. Marks

Office Information
Christine F. Marks
Metro Corporate Campus I P.O. Box 5600,
Woodbridge, NJ 07095-0988


Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP (Woodbridge, New Jersey)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.