Thomas M. Dickinson

Attorney in Winchester, VA

Affiliations

· Virginia State Bar

· Member and past President of the Winchester-Frederick County Bar Association

· Member and past Chairman of the Winchester School Board

· Member of the Board of Missions for the Winchester District of the United Methodist Church

· Member of the Winchester Rotary Club

· Former member of the Winchester Board of Zoning Appeals

Professional Highlights

· Master Commissioner in Chancery, Circuit Court for City of Winchester

· Assistant Commissioner of Accounts for Frederic County, VA.

· Infantry Captain, United States Army, 1968-70

· Vietnam Veteran

(540) 723-8877
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info
Rating Not Shown

Areas of Law

  • Commercial & Financial Services

     

    Peer Rating

    Rating Not Shown
    This lawyer has chosen not to display the rating(s) provided by his or her peers.

    Experience & Credentials

    Position

    Of Counsel

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1968, Virginia
    U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia

    Law School Attended

    University of Richmond T.C. Williams School of Law
    Class of 1968
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Virginia Military Institute
    Class of 1965
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1943
    1943

    Contact Information

    Phone

    (540) 723-8877

    Fax

    (540) 450-1535

    Email

    Send email to Thomas M. Dickinson


    Office Information
    Thomas M. Dickinson
    Of Counsel
     480 West Jubal Early Drive, Suite 130,
    Winchester, VA 22601

    Loading...

    Logo
    Bowles Rice LLP (Winchester, Virginia)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.