Mark A. Kepple LinkedIn

Attorney in Wheeling, WV
Mark A. Kepple is a Member of the law firm of Bailey & Wyant, PLLC’s Wheeling office where he practices in general litigation successfully trying cases in Northern West Virginia and Eastern Ohio. Mr. Kepple’s particular interests include litigating personal injury matters, employment and civil rights disputes, consumer actions, product liability cases, construction defects and oil & gas disputes. Mr. Kepple blends traditional litigation tactics and old fashion common sense advice to form a unique and dynamic approach to solving complex problems and legal issues. This style is particularly valuable in complicated high stakes litigation or matters involving awkward, uncomfortable or “sensitive” facts.

Mr. Kepple is admitted to the bar in the states of West Virginia and Ohio, the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Mr. Kepple graduated from Shepherd College cum laude, B.S. 1994 and West Virginia University College of Law, J.D. 1997.


Mr. Kepple lives in Wheeling, West Virginia with his wife and two children.

304-233-3100
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 3.7 of 5

Areas of Law

  • General Civil Litigation
  • Insurance Defense
  • Labor and Employment
  • Products Liability
  • Personal Injury
  • State, County and Municipal Governmental Liability
  • Insurance Coverage
  • Unfair Trade Practices
  • Legal and Other Professional Liability
  • Toxic Torts
  • Construction
  • Design Defect
  • Real Estate
  • Estate Planning
  • Mediation
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Deliberate Intent Litigation
  • Dram Shop Act Litigation

 

Peer Rating

bv

Overall Peer Rating

in Litigation, Personal Injury and Labor and Employment
3.7 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
3.8
Analytical Capabilities
3.8
Judgment
3.4
Communication Ability
3.5
Legal Experience
4.1

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1997, West Virginia and U.S. District Court, Southern and Northern Districts of West Virginia
1998, Ohio and U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio
2007, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania

Law School Attended

West Virginia University College of Law
Class of 1997
J.D.

University Attended

Shepherd College
Class of 1994
B.S.
cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1971
Hagerstown, Maryland

Associations & Memberships

Ohio County Bar Association; West Virginia State Bar; Defense Research Institute; West Virginia Defense Trial Counsel.

Representative Cases

Marcus v. Holley 217 W.Va. 508, 618 S.E.2d 517; American Nat. Property and Cas. Co. v. Stipanovich 2007 WL 2385235; Vick v. Hancock County Bd. of Educ. 2008 WL 619201; Ohio Midland, Inc. v. Proctor 2006 WL 1645237.

Contact Information

Phone

304-233-3100

Fax

304-233-0201

Email

Send email to Mark A. Kepple

Social Networking



Office Information
Mark A. Kepple
Member
 1219 Chapline Street,
Wheeling, WV 26003

Loading...

Logo
Bailey & Wyant, PLLC (Wheeling, West Virginia)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.