Jennifer D. Newberger

Jennifer D. Newberger 0 0 reviews - Read Reviews or Write a Review
Jennifer D. Newberger is a Lawyer in Washington, District of Columbia

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a review
Peer Rating N/A help_info
(202) 737-4292

About This Lawyer

Jennifer D. Newberger specializes in medical device law, assisting manufacturers on a broad spectrum of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) matters, including: developing regulatory strategies and preparing product applications; compliance matters, such as MDRs, recalls, and GMPs; advertising and promotion compliance; and regulatory due diligence. Ms. Newberger graduated magna cum laude from the University of Miami School of Law in 2007, earned a Masters of Public Health in International Health from Emory University in 2001, and graduated with honors from Washington University in St. Louis in 1999 with a B.A. in Anthropology. Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Newberger worked as a policy a... View more More

Areas of Law

  • FDA and Healthcare
  • Food and Drug Regulation
  • Food, Drug and Cosmetic Law

Contact Information

Phone

(202) 737-4292

Email

Send email to Jennifer D. Newberger

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Associate

Admission Details

Admitted in 2007, District of Columbia

Law School Attended

University of Miami School of Law
Class of 2007
J.D.
magna cum laude

University Attended

Washington University, St. Louis
Class of 1999
B.A.
Anthropology, with honors

Emory University
Class of 2001
M.P.H.
International Health

Community Contributions

Office Information
Jennifer D. Newberger
700 Thirteenth Street, N.W., Suite 1200,
Washington, DC 20005-5929
U.S.A.
Loading...

Logo
Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. (Washington, District of Columbia)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.