Robert R. McGill

Attorney in Walkersville, MD
Completed coursework for MA in Philosophy; Master's thesis: Berkeley's mind/body distinction. Practicing before the Merit Systems Protection Board.

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

Federal Administrative Law
Federal Administrative Law


Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Administrative Law, Employee Benefits and Government
4.9 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 6 reviews
  • Recommended by 6 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 12/16/13
Posted by a Consumer on 12/16/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I hired Robert R. McGill in order to obtain medical disability retirement from the USPS. I could not have done it without him. I have never met him face-to-face but I have never dealt with an attorney who was as responsive, ethical, and thorough. He gets the job done. He is a well-oiled machine, a one man operation who gets the job done quickly and with a straightforward no-nonsense approach. He is focused only on getting the job done and he will keep you focused and relaxed during the process
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1988, Maryland, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Law School Attended

Columbus School of Law of the Catholic University of America
Class of 1988

University Attended

Catholic University
Class of 1983
Philosophy, summa cum laude

University of Virginia
Class of 1984
Graduate School of Philosophy

Birth Information

Born in 1958
Yokohama, Japan, December 2, 1958


U.S. Army, 1977-1980

Associations & Memberships

Bar Association of Montgomery County.

Contact Information



Office Information
Robert R. McGill
 P.O. Box 687,
Walkersville, MD 21793


Robert R. McGill (Walkersville, Maryland)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.