The Dickerson & Smith Law Group

Law Firm in Virginia Beach, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation
  • Family Law
  • Collections
  • Personal Injury
  • Traffic Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Bankruptcy Law
  • Military Law
  • Landlord and Tenant Law
  • Real Estate.
 

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law and Bankruptcy
4.2 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
4.3
Responsiveness
4.4
Quality of Service
4.3
Value for Money
3.8

  • Data based on 6 reviews
  • Recommended by 5 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 01/19/14
Posted by a Consumer on 01/19/14
1.0 out of 5.0
DO NOT USE THIS FIRM!!! I used Mr. Mettler for bankruptcy and the miscommunication, mishandling of my case caused it be dismissed. I am filing a complaing with the Better Business Bureau. I paid $1500 and when it came time for my 341 meeting, they mailed my paperwork for me to review to the wrong address. I have never filed bankruptcy before and didn't know the necessary steps that needed to be taken. That's what I paid him for. I didn't know the trustee needed to paperwork 7 days before the meeting. And he should made sure all paperwork was together before he filed instead of having me come in the 11th hour (one day before 341 hearing). I didn't have my social security card and he said the IRS office at the federal building would give me an abstract of my last years tax return, I went there the morning of my hearing and was told they no longer did that for a year! Mr. Mettler completely screwed up my case and is refusing to fix it or refund my money.
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Related Law Firms
Loading...

Virginia Beach, Virginia
757-637-6816 | Email
Client Rating N/A

Peer Rating N/A


Virginia Beach, Virginia
877-355-5197 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.9 / 5.0



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.