Andrew H. Hook

Attorney in Virginia Beach, VA
Phone number not available
View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Elder Law
  • Estate Administration
  • Trust Administration
  • Estate Planning
  • Long Term Care
  • Veterans Aid & Attendance Benefits

 

Overall Client Rating

in Trusts and Estates and Elder Law
4.5 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
4.7
Responsiveness
4.7
Quality of Service
4.7
Value for Money
4.0

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 10/31/12
Posted by a Consumer on 10/31/12
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
I've dealt with a fair amount of attorneys, but Andy is the best I have come across so far. He is sincere and is a wealth of knowledge. Top notch attorney and great guy.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1975, Virginia, U.S. District Court, District of Virginia, U.S. Tax Court, U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Bar Fellowship

American College of Trusts and Estates Counsel, 2000. Author: "Durable Powers of Attorney - They Are Not Forms!" In the Estates, Gifts and Trusts Journal by Tax Management Inc., Vol. 24, No. 5; "What is CELA?" in the Elder's Advisor: Journal of Elder Law, 2000; "Mr. Hook, I have been sued!" in the Elder Law Advisor by West Group, 2000. Author and P... More


Featured Lawyers
Loading...


J.S. Burton, P.L.C.
Virginia Beach, U.S.A.
757-301-4520 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating N/A


Shupert Law
Virginia Beach, U.S.A.
757-606-0903 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating N/A


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.